Talk:The Monsters Inside

BBC Low‑importance

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles

Low

This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

Doctor Who Low‑importance

	Doctor Who portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Doctor Who, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Doctor Who and its spin-offs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Doctor WhoWikipedia:WikiProject Doctor WhoTemplate:WikiProject Doctor WhoDoctor Who articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Novels: Sci-fi Low‑importance

	Novels portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect is supported by Science fiction task force.

Blathereen vs. Slitheen

Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Maybe I need to read the book again, but I am pretty sure the Blathereen were described as nearly identical to the Slitheen. Otherwise the Slitheen would be unable to wear their skins. Chronolegion 13:27, 4 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

The only place the size of the Blathereen is mentioned is by Flowers on page 141 and refers to only one of them (Ermenshrew). The quote is 'bigger and paler than either Ecktosca of Dram Fel Fotch.' Since the Slitheen do wear the skins of the Blathereen at the end of the book, unless they've also developed an "expansion" devise (not mentioned anywhere in the book), they wouldn't be very convincing. Since both the Doctor and Rose have seen Slitheen before, it seems that one or both would mention it if these new monsters were so much bigger (on average) than those they had seen before. I changed the reference, in any case. Gwydionmom 15:31, 27 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Canonicity

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

It was mentioned in Boom Town - in my eyes, that confirms canonicity. Can't dispute it if it was referenced in a televised story. On the other hand, the book Human Nature is definitely non-canonical, as it was remade as a televised story with a different Doctor and companion. Digifiend (talk) 14:25, 29 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Add topic