Talk:The Mighty Lemon Drops
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled edit
Couple of uses of "excellent" seem a bit NPOV..... ChrisTheDude 08:42, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Mightylemondrops.jpg edit
Image:Mightylemondrops.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 01:02, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Plagarism edit
Looks like much of the biography originally came from [1]. I gave the article a good clean-up before discovering this, which has reduced the amount of borrowed prose remaining in the article, but thought it needed to be mentioned - Foetusized (talk) 21:54, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Suggest minor correction of grammar as follows: 'In 2007 the band were reported to have been offered the chance to reform at the Coachella festival.[citation needed]' Furry Canary (talk) 13:15, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
Neo-psychedelia edit
Not up with the 500 music catagories that are being invented everyday. but since when was Neo-psychedelia was a category and used to describe band like these. Its just post punk and influence by 60's Garage and psychedelia as I see it. its being edited out.
"Their sound can best be described as neo-psychedelia in the vein of Echo & the Bunnymen, played with a ringing Rickenbacker guitar as the lead instrument.[1]"69.165.138.51 (talk) 04:02, 17 June 2011 (UTC)