This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This article should be deleted as it gives no new information about the said book. The book is already outlined in George Davie's biography and this article is totally superfluous as it stands. There is no point in initiating an article if the author of it has nothing to say about the subject, and may well have never read the book. Readers of Wikipedia who follow the link will be understandably annoyed that they have wasted their time by doing so. Wikipedia is supposed to be about serving the public and, in my opinion, such empty articles only sully Wikipedia's reputation. (Ajsinclair (talk) 15:01, 7 November 2012 (UTC))Reply
