Talk:The Conversation (Mad About You)

Latest comment: 3 years ago by JuneGloom07 in topic GA Review



GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:The Conversation (Mad About You)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 23:58, 16 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Some Dude From North Carolinawanna talk? 23:58, 16 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Infobox and lead

edit
  • This article's infobox has some parameters that can be filled in, such as the episode's producers (Craig Knizek, William Cosentino, and Mike Martineau), cinematographer (Bobby Byrne), and editor (Sheila Amos). Information can be found here.
  • Second sentence in the lead ends too soon. Try merging it with the next one.

Plot

edit
  • Since there's no cast section, episode articles usually have the actors' names in this section.
  • This section is 294 words long, so there are no problems with MOS:TVPLOT.
  • Add a comma after "he is shrinking".
    •   Done

Production

edit

Conception and writing

edit
  • "Victor Levin wrote the script. He believed" --> "Victor Levin wrote the script, believing that"
  • "and Helen Hunt's talents. He also hoped" --> "and Helen Hunt's talents, also hoping that"
  • "something show personnel" --> "something the show's personnel"
  • "They were unable" --> "However, they were unable"
    •   Done

Filming and broadcast

edit
  • Cinematographer Bobby Byrne should probably be mentioned in this section.
  • Other than that, I couldn't find any other issues here.

Reception

edit

Ratings

edit

Critical response

edit
  • New section, so the names Paul Reiser and Helen Hunt should be in full.
  • Put quotation marks around the word "special".
    •   Done

Other stuff

edit

Overview

edit

GAN table

edit
GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):  
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  

Overall:
Pass/Fail:  

  ·   ·   ·  

Notes

edit