This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StatisticsWikipedia:WikiProject StatisticsTemplate:WikiProject StatisticsStatistics articles
Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Can the summary be rewritten without the subsections, so it's more like a paragraph per chapter. Compare with Outliers (book). AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 16:07, 21 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
Hi, thanks for reviewing the article. What would be the purpose of removing the subsections? The subsections are there to make the article easier to read. Cheers, Alfredsph (talk) 10:16, 22 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
Alfredsph, it's excessive sectioning. Unless the chapters are themselves individual essays for an anthology, they don't need to be highlighted like that. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 20:56, 22 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
