Talk:The Beheading of St John the Baptist (Caravaggio)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Death Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Malta Low‑importance

	Malta portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Malta, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Malta on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MaltaWikipedia:WikiProject MaltaTemplate:WikiProject MaltaMalta articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Unidentified character edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Who is depicted in the shadows on the right hand side of the painting? Grandma Roses (talk) 15:14, 13 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Two of John's followers, I'd imagine, peering in through a barred window. Johnbod (talk) 17:04, 13 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Remove the Head edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This painting ought to be seen and described for what it is and not entered into a subjective rating system in the very first paragraph. It encourages the idea that works of art are in competition with each other, a projection surely, one generated by art critics and supported by the public. Giving us the opinions of two critics, neither of whom is actually telling us anything important ('the best', 'important' etc)seems like a missed opportunity; immodest and so the very opposite of what the artist would have wanted for his labour. Please consider a different approach. Thank you. M.H. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.127.10.100 (talk) 08:19, 25 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic