Talk:The American Boy's Handy Book

Merge

edit

Recommend merge- this will probably never grow, and most of it is already in the Beard article. --Gadget850 ( Ed) 15:33, 11 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

I disagree: one is an article on the man, and one is an article on the book. This is a stub with room to grow, I see no reason why it should be redirected. Snoutwood (talk) 01:22, 14 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
OK, merge withdrawn. --Gadget850 ( Ed) 02:13, 14 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject class rating

edit

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 13:48, 9 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:AmerBoyHandybook.jpg

edit
 

Image:AmerBoyHandybook.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 17:47, 13 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Fixed --— Gadget850 (Ed) talk - 18:18, 13 February 2008 (UTC)Reply