This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
Intro: It says "'Zero Sum' helped to…" I assume this was just a typo.
I'm a terrible copy-paster. GRAPPLEX 03:47, 3 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
Infobox: I would add a cite for the cast
Added.
Production: What exactly is "verisimilitude"? Maybe wikilink it or explain it
Realism, or the nature of being realistic; I could point it to verisimilitude or wikt:verisimilitude if you want, not sure which would be best for the casual reader; could also just reword it too if you think something else works best. GRAPPLEX 03:47, 3 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
Production: "Director Rob Bowman has admitted that the episode exceeded its given budget, noting…" I would remove the 'has' to say: "Director Rob Bowman admitted that the episode exceeded its given budget, noting…"
Reception: Should "A-" use an en-dash? Like "A–"? I'm not really sure, but I think so.
MOS:MATHS uses "−" for minus, which is halfway between those two in size. I'll start using that from now on and try to roll it out on any past articles where I've used a hyphen-minus. GRAPPLEX 03:47, 3 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
Those hyphens and dashes drive me crazy.--Gen. Quon (talk) 14:26, 3 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
Those are the only things I can find. Solid article. On hold.--Gen. Quon (talk) 03:19, 3 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the ridiculously prompt review. I've got everything so far except "verisimilitude", let me know which of the above options works best for you. GRAPPLEX 03:47, 3 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
No problem. I submitted a few last night and saw this, so I decided to review it. Everything looks great; frankly I like the word verisimilitude, so I'd keep it and just link it to the Wiki page, that works for me.--Gen. Quon (talk) 14:25, 3 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
Fair do. I've linked to the wiki article for it then. GRAPPLEX 14:27, 3 May 2012 (UTC)Reply