Talk:Technology of television

Reorganising various analogue television pages

edit

I've recently written how television works, intending it as a guide to what the various bits of electronics inside a television set do, and how they fit together. It has been suggested this should have been added to Technology of television instead. While we're at it, though, I think Analog television covers much of the same ground as Technology of television, and there's also overlap with Broadcast television systems and History of television. Many subjects are covered multiple times.

What do you think?

  • Is How Television Works redundant and can be deleted entirely?
  • Should we merge everything into one monster article?
  • Should we have smaller articles (e.g. display technology, analog switch-off, deployment by country) and a top-level index page?
  • Should we have parallel articles duplicating some content but with different focus?

IanHarvey (talk) 10:17, 22 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Don't Merge - How television works is an indepth article that'll lose it's quality if merged. —IncidentFlux (talk) 09:32, 11 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. I propose a reorganisation as described below. IanHarvey (talk) 12:36, 20 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

I agree with your proposal. Good suggestions. Thomprod (talk) 13:26, 20 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Proposed Changes

edit

User:IanHarvey suggests the following:


Update 10/3/2008 - I've moved as many digital switchover articles as I could find to Digital switchover, with some more waffly stuff to Digital_switchover_in_the_United_Kingdom. It could do with some more work, but it's bedtime... IanHarvey (talk) 23:11, 10 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
The page name should be changed if the article is kept. Analog television technology would be a likely name. -- Alan Liefting- (talk) - 06:34, 12 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Technology of television

edit

This article appears out dated

Suggesting OLEDS are a new tech for Large stadiums for example.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.33.23.243 (talk) 14:44, 6 January 2015 (UTC)Reply