Talk:Taiga Cordillera

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Cyberbot II in topic External links modified

Not a mountain range article

edit

this and other Ecozone articles shoudl be dabbed with "(ecozone)" and more specifically "(CEC ecozone); I've removed WP:Mountains and substituted WP:Ecology as "Taiga Cordillera" is not a term used in geography/orography. The citations provided are also POV and peacockish in nature....Skookum1 (talk) 12:57, 11 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Most sparsely populated ecozone

edit

This is extremely doubtful and the source given in the inline citation does not say this (it does say that only a few hundred people live here, which is highly doubtful as well, there should at least be a few thousand, though I can't verify this). If you look at any population density map, the density of the Northern Arctic and Southern Arctic regions will be even lower than the taiga cordillera. I will remove the "most sparsely populated" statement, but not the "a few hundred" statement, as, although very dubious, the source does state this, and I can't yet find a source to verify my suspicion that many more people than that live here. 1brettsnyder (talk) 20:44, 28 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Taiga Cordillera Ecozone (CEC). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:17, 23 February 2016 (UTC)Reply