Talk:Supercoppa Italiana
Latest comment: 2 months ago by BumbleBum in topic Four team format
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Random use of colour in table edit
@Juve2000: added the colour to the table in 2013, I removed it today based on it being an unnecessary styling, but @BumbleBum: re-added it saying it is necessary. We already use boldface. There is no legend. This is possibly going against MOS:COLOUR due to accessibility issues. This should be removed. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 03:47, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
- Before I go any further, I wish to apologize for writing such a short, blunt statement when I 'reverted' your edit yesterday. I should have explained myself much better. I do not agree with your statement that the green used is some random colour. Green is used thoughout the team soccer pages to represent 'victory' or 'winning team', sometimes with legend, sometimes without it. If you want to talk about legend, there is none for the boldface either. A legend can be easily added. I don't know what MOS:COLOUR says, but I don't see you trying to eliminate the green colour from all soccer pages. If I had to choose between boldface and green to represent the winner, I have always been of the opinion that the colour green makes it much easier on the reader to see which team has won or advanced. I sometimes have to look twice to see which team has the boldface. If I wasn't such an amateur editor (who sometimes does not edit for months), I would bring this up in the Champions League, Europa League or even the Soccer/Football Project discussion page. There are many editors, including yourself, who dedicate a lot more time and effort to keeping all the soccer/football soccer pages accurate and up-to-date, so I think who am I to change a practice in the english wikipedia that has gone on for years. I guess I have also been influenced by the italian wikipedia soccer/football pages which uses green instead of boldface (or maybe both). Please look the Supercoppa Italiana page again using both just boldface and the green, and let me know which is easier on the eye. I will defer to your judgement.BumbleBum (talk) 02:40, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
List of winners edit
In my opinion it would be better to modify the table of the winners list following this example
| Year | Champion | Score | Runner-up |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1988 | Milan | 3–1 | Sampdoria |
Dr Salvus (talk) 12:37, 14 January 2021 (UTC)Dr SalvusDr Salvus (talk) 12:37, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
- I think the current table that has been in use for years is fine, the only thing that should be removed is the scorers column, this is too detailed for just the list of winners, and there are already articles for each edition if someone wants to check the scorers. Snowflake91 (talk) 22:52, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
- I agree with Snowflake91, there is no need to add links to each competition as a team's qualifying route is already listed by the column in which it appears; the suggested alternative table is way too cluttered. Although the scorers column is unnecessary is not that egregious, if it was put to a vote though I would favour its removal. Maranello10 (talk) 01:14, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Four team format edit
Do we know AND do we list the rules regarding which teams are chosen if the same team or teams who are one (and two) in Serie A repeat as finalists for fhe Coppa Italia? Also, how are the semi-final match-ups determined under ANY circumstance? Thank youBumbleBum (talk) 05:03, 29 February 2024 (UTC)