Talk:Summer Magic (EP)

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Summer Magic (EP) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Korea Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Korean popular culture working group.

"Special" Mini Album

Latest comment: 5 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

I don't see what's informative about calling this a "special" album. There is no information about what qualifies it as particularly "special" other than a mention that it was marketed as such, with no citation. Is it supposed to be special because it was released in summer? It just sounds like an advertisement for the album, and not something that's notable enough about it to count it separately to other Red Velvet EPs.

At the moment there are sections in other Red Velvet articles like "RBB is the upcoming fifth extended play (eighth overall)" which doesn't even make sense. Either RBB is their fifth EP or it's their eighth, just putting "overall" after the second number without another qualifier on the first number doesn't change that.

Someone please clean up these parts, either by differentiating them in a meaningful way with citations, or by just grouping all the EPs together.122.56.203.109 (talk) 11:04, 16 November 2018 (UTC).Reply

I don't agree with it either, but someone keeps changing them. So I wanted to just put it as something like "eighth (marketed as their fifth)" or just put the marketing bit in the Background. Korean news sites don't consider them as regular EPs because of how the companies market them, which is why most articles are written that way. Lonedirewolf 12:50, 16 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

If every Korean site calls it that then fair enough. Would be great if they could get citations though, and either way to change the wording because like I said the current wording makes no sense.115.189.92.27 (talk) 12:17, 23 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic