Talk:Street Cleaning Simulator

Latest comment: 11 years ago by 143.92.1.32 in topic Gamespot user score is not a joke

Gamespot user score is not a joke edit

became a theme for jokes

When someone can just come in and vandalize an article with absurd claims, shows exactly why Wikipedia will never be taken seriously as an objective source of facts and information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.234.60.139 (talk) 06:24, 23 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

3/10, I almost fell for it. 143.92.1.32 (talk) 03:20, 27 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:StreetCleaningSimulator.jpg Nominated for Deletion edit

  An image used in this article, File:StreetCleaningSimulator.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests November 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 15:14, 8 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:SCSboxArtlr.JPG Nominated for speedy Deletion edit

 

An image used in this article, File:SCSboxArtlr.JPG, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 11 November 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 17:33, 11 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Contributing to this article edit

If you wish to contribute to this article, as with all articles you must maintain a neutral point of view. All claims should be verifiable and attributed to reliable sources. Do not introduce original research, such as reviews of your own. Help is always appreciated, but only if it adheres to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If anyone has access to the issue of PC Gamer UK that reviews this game, that would certainly be a useful source to cite. There may be other suitable sources too, but they need to be reliable. If you're unsure if a source is reliable, you can ask at WT:VG/RS. Reach Out to the Truth 21:58, 15 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

The search for sources edit

I did a bit of searching for coverage of this game in reliable reliable sources. In addition to the GameSpot sources already in the article, I found... two.

There's probably not much to say about the UGO article other than the fact it was on the list, but the RPS source is good and should be added to the article. I really wish there was more than this. There's still the PC Gamer UK review, but I don't have access to the magazine. Reach Out to the Truth 15:57, 16 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

PC Gamer UK review is in the September 2011 issue. Hopefully that helps. Reach Out to the Truth 16:05, 16 November 2011 (UTC)Reply