Talk:Stonewall Attack

i think that this artical would benefit greatly by running down an example opening, with the black moves included, and a breif analysis thereof. this would give people a better understanding of how black would react to the stonewall attack (perhaps both an amature and a master), and how white can turn the "well timed bishop sacrifice on h7" into real gains. --69.136.244.138 04:34, 2 August 2005 (UTC)

• Much of this article was based on a very old Chess Life article from 1980 or 1981. I think it was written by Larry D Evans and it was titled "Stonewalling"... it had a sample game there, I will need some time to find it though... I also looked at a Mednis article about this opening in a 1995 issue of Chess Life. Sjakkalle (Check!) 11:49, 4 August 2005 (UTC)

Good memory. I've added the article as a reference and the sample game. Bubba73 (talk), 14:37, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

"As the name implies, the Stonewall setup is a solid formation which is hard to overrun by force"

i was under the assumption it was for... other reasons. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.15.66.242 (talk) 04:20, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Attack?

Is attack really the correct name for this opening. I know it as simply the stonewall. SunCreator (talk) 00:20, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

The Oxford Companion does call it the Stonewall Attack when played by White. It is under the entry Stonewall though, but that includes by white or black. Bubba73 (talk), 03:37, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Stonewall Attack. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://chesscamp.net/files/page7-1034-full.jpg

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:50, 3 April 2016 (UTC)