Talk:St John of God Geraldton Hospital
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Altamel in topic Update information
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
 | The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
Update information
edit | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. |
Update reference to St John of God Health Care to read: St John of God Health Care is one of the largest Catholic providers of health care services in Australia.[1]
References
- ^ https://sjog.org.au.
{{cite web}}: Missing or empty|title=(help)
--AnneGartner (talk) 08:53, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
- Please provide an independent reference for the statement. Mitch Ames (talk) 11:59, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
- Hi AnneGartner. Thank you for your suggestion. I am declining the first edit request for two reasons. First, I agree with Mitch Ames that you must provide an independent source. Second, labeling a hospital network the "largest" is vague and ambiguous. St John could be the largest by hospital beds, by expenditures, or by number of doctors; but the point is, Wikipedia articles should avoid using vaguely positive terms when more specific descriptions would do better. Best, Altamel (talk) 19:12, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
- Talk page watchers, please see a relevant discussion at WP:COIN. Altamel (talk) 19:14, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
- Hi AnneGartner. Thank you for your suggestion. I am declining the first edit request for two reasons. First, I agree with Mitch Ames that you must provide an independent source. Second, labeling a hospital network the "largest" is vague and ambiguous. St John could be the largest by hospital beds, by expenditures, or by number of doctors; but the point is, Wikipedia articles should avoid using vaguely positive terms when more specific descriptions would do better. Best, Altamel (talk) 19:12, 5 June 2020 (UTC)