This article is part of WikiProject Missouri, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Missouri. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MissouriWikipedia:WikiProject MissouriTemplate:WikiProject MissouriMissouri articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mormonism and the Latter Day Saint movement on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latter Day Saint movementWikipedia:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movementTemplate:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movementLatter Day Saint movement articles
Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I have tagged this article for NPOV. The second and third paragraphs are utterly biased. If you're going to rehash what's in Missouri Executive Order 44 (and, yes, that's the title of the article, not Missouri Extermination Order), you have to make it more neutral...the Mormons were packing heat as well. Purplebackpack89≈≈≈≈19:08, 3 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
Agreed that the comments about LDS history in Missouri are not directly related to the temple. I've edited the text to remove editorial comments unrelated to the temple itself. Can we agree the text is now written from an NPOV? 216.240.30.23 (talk) 15:10, 16 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
