Spam Lit was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 24 June 2016 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Spam poetry. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Yikes. Thought I'd set to work on cleaning up this article post-AfDs. It's taking some restraint not to cut just about everything, as it's based almost entirely on primary sources/original research (taking the form "here are some examples I found"). Looks like it's going to need some effort to start over using the sources presented at AfD, etc. — Rhododendritestalk \\ 14:05, 25 June 2016 (UTC)Reply
