Talk:Sleep (band)

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 2A02:A420:50:E0B1:2:1:17FB:B1F5 in topic Activity

Jerusalem- divided into six parts edit

Just wanted to explain my edit; The decision to divide Jerusalem was made by the individual who released the first bootleg of Jerusalem in '98, not by Sleep. The official version released by Rise Above the following year was probably created using the bootleg CD as a master, which is why the track divisions remain. Druff 16:33, 5 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Gummo edit

They also did 2 tracks for gummo. Can this possibly be added to the list in the discography outside of it? i have no idea how to do it. Darksteel 14:21, 15 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

done! Olliegrind 14:44, 2 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Sleep's Holy Mountain release year edit

Holy Mountain was recorded in 1992 and copyrighted in 1992, but Earache didn't release it until late 1993. This was one of the first and most exacerbating reasons that Sleep didn't stay with the label. Druff 05:55, 15 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

I added stuff + How large is Sleeps fanbase? edit

i made a sleep template, a discography page and a member timeline for all ya sleep adorers!!!! anybody know how large thhe fanbase is and was for sleep????? all their albums (but vol.2) are on itunes

What do you mean? In absolute numbers of fans? In comparison to other bands? In comparison to justin biebers hysterical fan base? All of which are relative, and all of which have no value of information. 193.90.164.223 (talk) 15:32, 22 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Sleep logo band.png edit

 

Image:Sleep logo band.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 10:59, 29 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Sleepsleep.jpg edit

 

Image:Sleepsleep.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:26, 24 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Activity edit

Whoever said "2019" there needs to look up the definition of a hiatus again. 2A02:A420:50:E0B1:2:1:17FB:B1F5 (talk) 13:08, 4 June 2022 (UTC)Reply