Talk:Siyum HaShas

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Noam E. Bechhofer in topic Shas-a-thon

edit

possible Merge with Daf Yomi?

JJ211219 03:43, 26 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Arithmetic

edit

7 1/2 years is 2,739 days (the exact number depends on unequal months, leap year, and maybe the Hebrew calendar). So 2,711 pages in 7 1/2 years is about one page per day. So why did someone make a point out of changing it to one folio (that is, two pages) per day on Did You Know? This article also says one folio per day but only 2,711 pages. Art LaPella 23:29, 16 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

  • The issue is terminology. While most English language books have pages numbered sequentially, the standard Talmud has page numbers 2a and 2b on opposite sides of the first leaf, 3a and 3b on the second leaf, etc. A "daf" is both sides, or two pages (as commonly used), which is what is studied each day. On the first day of a new tractate, both 2a and 2b are studied (there is no daf 1). As the term folio is rarely used (the folio article doesn't help clarify the usage), "Daf Yomi" is often translated as "page a day". One might more accurately state 2,711 folios (or less accurately 5,422 pages, as there are some half pages at the end of tractates), but that might only add to the confusion. I agree that the wording is imperfect and could well be improved. Alansohn 06:20, 17 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Connection between Siyum Hashas and Daf Yomi

edit

A Siyum Hashas is made upon the completion of the study of the entire Talmud. Many people complete the study of the Talmud in 7 and a half years by participating in the Daf Yomi program. Other people go at their own pace, sometimes finishing it sooner than 7 years, sometimes taking longer. They too make a Siyum Hashas upon completion of their study of the Talmud. This article gives the impression that a Siyum Hashas is (only) made upon a completion of the Daf Yomi cycle. Danthecan (talk) 16:22, 15 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Good point. This information has been included under "Other Uses". Yoninah (talk) 18:48, 29 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Siyum HaShas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:15, 27 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Shas-a-thon

edit

According to the section Other Uses,

An initiative known as a Shas-A-Thon brings hundreds and even thousands of participants together to study and complete the entire Talmud in one day. This initiative is sometimes used as a fund-raiser, with participants collecting pledges from donors.

First, these sentences should be considered for removal; it's not clear why, of the countless groups which make a siyum hashas, shas-a-thon deserves its own mention in this section. Second, if it is determined that these sentences should remain, it would be useful to clarify whether the number of participants number in the hundreds or thousands, and then to adjust the article accordingly; "hundreds and even thousands" does not portray an encyclopedic tone. NoamB (talk) 18:54, 2 August 2022 (UTC)Reply