Talk:Sivanandi Rajadurai
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Mzqerd001 in topic Removal of Neutrality Tag
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sivanandi Rajadurai article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
  | This article about an Indian scientist is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
Contested deletion
editThis page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (your reason here) The information provided are backed up with cross references. We intent to fix any promotional words and adjectives. I appreciate any suggestions. --Mzqerd001 (talk) 11:51, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
- The article is overly promotional. I have removed the most egregiously promotional stuff, but the article still needs a lot of editing and cleanup and somebody should check the references. --Randykitty (talk) 18:10, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for the tips to improve the article. Further systematic checking of the references and corrections will be incorporated to maintain the neutrality. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mzqerd001 (talk • contribs) 04:09, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
- As the intricate scientific details are removed, the overly detailed tag is removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mzqerd001 (talk • contribs) 04:20, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
- The article is edited without promotional information. Checked all the references. Corrections made. No dispute on neutrality. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mzqerd001 (talk • contribs) 10:48, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
- Corrections made, neutrality of the article maintained. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mzqerd001 (talk • contribs) 10:15, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
- Request to remove the neutrality dispute tag: as the article is improved with systematic checking of the references and providing corrections. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mzqerd001 (talk • contribs) 11:21, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
- Our understanding was to give the author's thrust research areas with references for readers to take advantage. If it is not acceptable, we request to insert the one line publication as in the earlier version (14 October 2015).Mzqerd001 (talk) 05:25, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Removal of Neutrality Tag
edit- Corrections made, neutrality of the article maintained. The neutrality template has been staying in the article for a long time without any discussion. In the absence of any discussion, we request to remove the Neutrality template in the article.Mzqerd001 (talk) 05:27, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Neutrality of the article is maintained. As the conditions are met, i.e: absence of any discussion, neutrality tag has been removed. Mzqerd001 (talk) 09:52, 21 July 2016 (UTC)