This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The HABS website and its writeup describe the place being built by Simeon E. Dow. The local website gives Simon E. Dow. Which is right? doncram (talk) 18:22, 19 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 15 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
I hereby protest the renaming of this article to Simon E. Dow House on the grounds "that it avoids disambiguation". That is not a valid criterion for renaming. The Crawford County Conservation Board, which has owned it since 1970 and had it listed in 1970 as Dow House, calls it Dow House. (See ref 2 in article). The name should be returned to Dow House {Dow City, Iowa). clariosophic (talk) 03:42, 20 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Also, why was the HABS external link deleted? This is certainly a proper link and is germane to the article. clariosophic (talk) 03:49, 20 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
I think naming it Simon E. Dow House or Simeon E. Dow House is not good, because there is uncertainty as to what is the correct name used by anyone. Probably in general and even more so in this specific house, going with the owners' preferences is best (with addition of (City, State) disambiguation).
About the HABS link, i also don't understand why it was deleted. Clariosophic's addition of a fact supported by a new footnote to the HABS source is fine, too, but the footnote formatting should be tailored somewhat differently than the HABS external link (the footnote should emphasize date and author-type stuff and probably should not go on about the photographs). There's role / need for both a footnote and a HABS external link, as are present in many (perhaps hundreds) of other articles. doncram (talk) 17:46, 20 May 2009 (UTC)Reply