This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Olympics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OlympicsWikipedia:WikiProject OlympicsTemplate:WikiProject OlympicsOlympics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Latest comment: 16 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
IMO, the section on qualification rules should belong to this article rather than the general article on shooting in the Olympics. These rules have probably changed several times during the Olympic history, and up until the 1970s or 80s have not existed at all (I don't have specific info on shooting, but that was the general rule in the Olympics in those days, except for team sports were qualification began were introduced earlier).--Nitsansh 20:31, 25 September 2007 (UTC)Reply
That could probably be done. As far as I know, the qualification process was introduced for the 1988 games. -- Jao 20:39, 25 September 2007 (UTC)Reply
That's 6 Olympic edition out of 25, if I did the math right. And the rules may have changed between those 6 Olympics as well.--Nitsansh 22:35, 30 September 2007 (UTC)Reply
Right (and they probably have, although not much, I think). It would not be too much work to integrate the info in the 1988–2008 specific articles. -- Jao 05:43, 1 October 2007 (UTC)Reply
