Talk:Sherman3D

Add topic
Active discussions
WikiProject Video games (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Old VersionEdit

Discussion related to a previous version of this article that was deleted. Monty845 23:08, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

Please do not delete this article. I am just updating the contribution after it was deleted on 2 June 2008 due to it being outdated.

I don't see why this article is marked as spam when it was here for years until someone deleted it because of it being outdated. Obviously, there is more information before but because the page has been deleted, I will have to gather the information again now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shermanchin (talkcontribs) 12:39, 28 July 2008 (UTC)


Information and significance of company to the Internet have been added. Please consider for permanent inclusion (noting that it was part of Wikipedia for years before its deletion). Please also help to re-link to the other appropriate sites as it was before it was deleted. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shermanchin (talkcontribs) 13:12, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

I do not see why this page has been repeatedly classified as spam when other company articles including our partner's at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/5th_Cell is not deemed so. Furthermore, this article was permanently here before it was deleted with the reason of it being not updated given. Also, according to the CSD page, this article obviously does not fall under: "11. Blatant advertising. Pages which exclusively promote some entity and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten to become encyclopedic. Note that simply having a company or product as its subject does not qualify an article for this criterion." The fact that I have been trying to make this encyclopedic and discussing it here proves that (see the note part of point 11). Please reconsider. Thank you.

Previous discussion has been deleted because it does not relate to the current rewritten article that has been approved and moved here after a Wikipedia deletion review. Alphakimori (talk) 23:02, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

CleanupEdit

I've done lots of cleanup, mostly due to inappropriate links, nonexistent links, duplicate links, and non-NPOV language. Please discuss before reverting. Thank you!

Overmage (talk) 04:44, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

I'd like to create a separate page for Sherman Chin and take the content from this page to populate that page. Would there be any objection to that?

Bytemarks (talk) 00:28, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modifiedEdit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sherman3D. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:30, 13 January 2018 (UTC)