Talk:Sherlock Holmes (2010 film)
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Requested move edit
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved. Ronhjones (Talk) 21:58, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
Sherlock Holmes (Asylum film) → Sherlock Holmes (2010 film) — As this is presumably the only film called Sherlock Holmes to come out in 2010, the film starring Robert Downey, Jr. of the same name having come out in 2009, it makes sense to disambiguate by year, rather than studio. In any case, the studio is The Asylum, not just "Asylum". —84.92.117.93 (talk) 21:08, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support Standard policy is to disambiguate by year. No issue with incoming links crossing with the 2009 movie. The visitor statistics are low on the 2010 redirect so I don't think a change will cause any issue. This one might be a candidate for a quick close, I don't see much reason to hold it back.--Labattblueboy (talk) 00:17, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
- The proposal is fine but why not Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's Sherlock Holmes? — AjaxSmack 05:36, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
- I innitially wondered the same thing. However IMDb lists it as Sherlock Holmes, so I jsut went with that.--Labattblueboy (talk) 14:41, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
- True, the Asylum website also calls it that. — AjaxSmack 03:13, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
- I innitially wondered the same thing. However IMDb lists it as Sherlock Holmes, so I jsut went with that.--Labattblueboy (talk) 14:41, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support i agree with the proposed rationale
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Line in reception makes no sense edit
"Reviews of the film have been mixed, with the majority being positive" Mixed is close to a 50/50 split. Majority being positive is something over 75%. This is being used in extreme error. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.94.195.173 (talk) 05:43, 17 January 2012 (UTC)