Talk:Seymour V/Line rail service

Australia: Victoria / Transport Low‑importance

	Australia portal Seymour V/Line rail service is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Victoria (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian Transport (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Victoria.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Trains

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Requested move

Latest comment: 13 years ago5 comments5 people in discussion

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move. Jafeluv (talk) 22:53, 14 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Seymour railway line, Victoria → Seymour V/Line rail service — 1. dab Victoria removed per nearly unanimous decision atTalk:Ballarat to Daylesford railway line; 2. V/Line as article about service not the line which is longer and has an article); 3. rail to be included in titles as V/Line also operate coach services Crusoe8181 (talk) 10:35, 6 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Warrnambool railway line → Warrnambool V/Line rail service
Traralgon railway line → Traralgon V/Line rail service
Geelong railway line, Victoria → Geelong V/Line rail service
Bairnsdale railway line → Bairnsdale V/Line rail service
Ballarat railway line, Victoria → Ballarat V/Line rail service
Ararat railway line, Victoria → Ararat V/Line rail service
Albury-Wodonga railway line, Victoria → Albury-Wodonga V/Line rail service
Support all Much less confusing and much more accurate. Allows for clear separation between the physical lines and the services operating on the line. Great idea and I hope the same concept is adopted elsewhere in Australia. -- Mattinbgn (talk) 10:50, 6 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
Support makes more sense to have the service article under the name of the service, especially as the actual lines are under a seperate article title anyway. Also as the lines can/do have multiple services operating on them. Gnan garra 11:22, 6 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
Support all, articles are about services, not about lines.--Grahame (talk) 00:41, 7 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Add topic