Talk:Sexaholics Anonymous

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Cyberbot II in topic External links modified

Untitled

edit

I think it would add to the article if S-Anon was mention as a counterpart to SA, similar to how COSA is to SAA (Sex Addicts Anonymous.

International conventions and many local events are hosted jointly.

Hopeserenity (talk) 12:43, 27 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Section: SA & S-Anon International Conventions

edit

According to NOT policy WP:INDISCRIMINATE I think this section should be removed. Rightswatcher (talk) 17:11, 4 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

"SA"

edit

The usage and primary topic of SA is under discussion, see Talk:Sturmabteilung -- 70.51.202.183 (talk) 05:02, 8 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sexaholics Anonymous. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:51, 4 April 2016 (UTC)Reply