Talk:Seven Grievances

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Chinese history.

Military history: Asian / Chinese Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Chinese military history task force

This stub is quite incomplete--either way, it's probably duplicative and ought to be merged into a larger, complete article...this information may likely already exist in full on the Chinse history articles. --Dpr 06:32, 14 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

I disagree. History of China is a huge article and only getting bigger. We need specifics like this article. Since it's been seven months since you put up the mergeto template, and no one else has indicated support, i'm removing it. Foobaz·o< 16:55, 1 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

I believe large encompassing events such as the Manchu Conquest and the founding of the Qing Dynasty are important enough and large enough events to justify a separate article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sacratoy (talk • contribs) 02:48, 20 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Seven Grievances. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161007063611/http://www.fs7000.com/wap/?9179.html to http://www.fs7000.com/wap/?9179.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:42, 15 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic