Talk:Separate Operational Purpose Division
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Degen Earthfast in topic OSNAZ is the obsolete term
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Separate Operational Purpose Division article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
Untitled edit
Why for all the confusion between Osnaz and Spetsnaz? It is a very straightforward matter. --Numerousfalx 08:38, 9 Oct 2004 (UTC)
OSNAZ is the obsolete term edit
"OSNAZ" term seems to be obsoleted in the 1970s or even in the 1960s by spetsnaz term. It is not (or almost not) used to refer to special forces of Russia. Please, adjust the article, Alpha Group, Vympel,etc. should not be here. Cmapm 00:59, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
OSNAZ is still the official MVD initialism used by the MVD. As it is still officially used it will stay.--Degen Earthfast (talk) 18:43, 26 June 2013 (UTC)