Talk:Send My Love (To Your New Lover)
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Send My Love (To Your New Lover) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1 |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 24 January 2016. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Send My Love (To Your New Lover). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://charts.monitorlatino.com/top20/Argentina/General
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:38, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Send My Love (To Your New Lover). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160729013636/http://charts.monitorlatino.com/top20/Guatemala/General to http://charts.monitorlatino.com/top20/Guatemala/General
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161228174302/http://oe3.orf.at/charts/stories/2749413/ to http://oe3.orf.at/charts/stories/2749413/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:40, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
Good article? edit
This article looks pretty solid at first glance. Is anyone familiar with its contents interested in trying to promote the article to Good status? ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:52, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
- I don't mind going in with you Another Believer — Calvin999 17:17, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
- @Calvin999: Awesome! Shall I go ahead and co-nominate, or do you want some time to comb through the article beforehand? I may also submit a request for a copy edit from the Guild of Copy Editors, which is always a good idea when considering GAN. ---Another Believer (Talk) 17:26, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
- UPDATE: I went ahead and requested a copy edit, which will be helpful even if we wait a bit to nominate the article. ---Another Believer (Talk) 17:28, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
@My love is love and MaranoFan: You both made significant edits to this article. Did either of you plan on nominating this article for Good status? I don't want to step on any toes. Or, do you have an interest in co-nominating? I'd like to see primary authors get credit for the article's promotion, but I'm also happy to nominate on others' behalf. ---Another Believer (Talk) 17:44, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
Oh I thought you meant to work on it? — Calvin999 18:59, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
- Do you have any thoughts on what needs work? ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:04, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
- It hasn't really been gone through, I thought you meant to go through it and improve it. I can't co-nominate something I haven't been involved in. — Calvin999 19:06, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
- Another Believer, I agree this article looks quite solid. Sorry for not responding when you had originally tagged me here (I was blocked then so I couldn't have, lol). Do you want to co-nominate this for GA with me if you have time currently? Also, My love is love appears to be inactive since November last year so I doubt they would mind.--NØ 17:30, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
- Maybe! Also wondering if User:Calvin999 wants to take a look at the article, per the above discussion. ---Another Believer (Talk) 17:42, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
- It was barely touched in 2018 so I don't think it does look like it is ready yet. — Calvin999 10:18, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
I think this article is great! So comprehensive and covers a lot of information that I wouldn't have thought to find myself. Any thoughts on improving the photos included I the article? I Think the snap from the music video and her live performance shot aren' as impactful as they could be. Thinking maybe better quality pictures and maybe enlarging the first picture and including a shot of her at Glastonbury with the crowd to give a better picture of her performance. Let me know your thoughts! Noellemary96 (talk) 18:54, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
Genre edit
The first sentence of the critical reception section calls the song "pop/R&B". Should we add R&B to the infobox, and add WikiProject R&B? ---Another Believer (Talk) 17:41, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
Added ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:30, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
