Talk:Senakhtenre Ahmose

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Khruner in topic Lemma: Ahmose I

New find

edit

His nomen will probably be forthcoming, as they've just found a doorjamb and fragmentary limestone lintelwith Senakht-en-Re's name, and apart from his prenomen, you can clearly see that his nomen is there, only covered by some soft material from the lifting of the stone. Source: Original article — Preceding unsigned comment added by PLstrom (talkcontribs) 00:22, 5 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Well, news just came out that his name is Senakhtenre Ahmose. So it seems we may need to change the title of the article. Apparently he was not named Tao at all. --AB (talk) 23:38, 22 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
The article should be renamed: Ahmose I.-- — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.16.170.193 (talk) 03:51, 25 May 2014 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Senakhtenre Ahmose. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:08, 6 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Lemma: Ahmose I

edit

The article should be moved to Ahmose I, because it is the first king with this sa-Ra-name. Ahmose I should be moved to Ahmose II and Ahmose II to Ahmose III.--183.182.121.20 (talk) 10:20, 2 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

183.182.121.20 It's not up to you to decide the ordinal numbers. Only Egyptologists can. And in all probability, they won't do it. Khruner (talk) 12:07, 2 May 2020 (UTC)Reply