Talk:Seebohm Rowntree

Biography assessment rating comment

WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive

The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 20:01, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Terrible

This article is terrible. It is very NPOV and unbalanced. It really needs to be re-edited by someone who knows what they are talking about. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.45.250.155 (talk) 16:52, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

clean up

I have attmepted a bit of clean up and therefore have removed the tag. 172.212.103.181 20:45, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Correcting definitions of Primary and Secondary Poverty

I'm planning to correct the definitions of Primary and Secondary Poverty to bring them in line with those in Rowntree's Book Poverty. Both groups being defined as being below the poverty line but for different reasons. The part of Poverty that deals with this can be read at the External Link to Glasgow University on the article, follow the link summary and conclusion and look at pages 295 and 296. Kaly99 12:29, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Plagarism?

The following concern was raised on the article's main page:

Large chunks of this work are lifetd direct from Haralambos and Holborn, "Sociology themes and perspectives." 4th edition (1998) see as an example "Criticism of his work." Compare with page 127 in H&H. Yet I see no acknowledgement of H&H in this text.

Francium12 (talk) 11:18, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

I independently assessed the criticism section as original research. It had already been tagged for lack of citations. I've taken the step of removing it. If other parts of this work are plagiarism, there may be copyright problems. --Geau (talk) 17:34, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Seebohm Rowntree. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081012011147/http://www.jrf.org.uk/centenary/poverty.html to http://www.jrf.org.uk/centenary/poverty.html
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.oup.com/view/article/35856
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081012011147/http://www.jrf.org.uk/centenary/poverty.html to http://www.jrf.org.uk/centenary/poverty.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070501165455/http://www2.arts.gla.ac.uk/History/ESH/rowntree/contents.html to http://www2.arts.gla.ac.uk/History/ESH/rowntree/contents.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:53, 30 November 2017 (UTC)