Talk:Secret Garden (South Korean TV series)

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Sexual assault portrayed as romantic in this drama edit

I created, in late February 2014, a "controversy" section in this article, reading as follows:

"Some Western viewers object strongly to scenes in which Kim Joo-won's sexual assaults on Gil Ra-im are portrayed as romantic, and received by her as such. As usual in discussions of media portrayals of sexual assault, other viewers object to these objections; some offer explanations involving traditional Korean gender politics."

I've removed the footnote because it didn't go anywhere, but the first sentence was referring to two blogs, one the single most important blog on Korean dramas in English, the other, well, not:

Dramabeans recap of episode 13, December 2010 Outside Seoul blog, August 2013.

This was removed March 1, with reference to the unreliability of blogs (as self-published works) as sources. Considering that the reference was essentially meant to back up "Some Western viewers object", I thought this preposterous: what's a more reliable source for someone's objections than, well, that person's objections? A friend, himself vehemently hostile to Wikipedia in general, nevertheless took the trouble to point out to me that the anonymity of blogs (anonymity being a personal pet peeve of his own) means that, in principle, I could be citing a single person who'd manufactured all the relevant posts and comments. This is preposterous, but I'm prepared to concede that if one's trying to do value-neutral editing, it sort of resembles a reasonable proposition.

And in any event the title of this talk section, which I created in response to the deletion, clearly isn't supported by this sort of content. So.

In the universe where not all people with similar thoughts are a single sock puppet, then, I, and a bunch of others who are not me and who posted about it long before I saw the relevant scenes, saw roughly the following: In episode 11 of the 20-episode drama, the leading man, Kim Joo-Won, played by Hyun Bin, grabs the leading woman, Gil Ra-Im, played by Ha Ji-Won, while both are standing, pulls her to him, and kisses her. By itself this is not unusual for Korean drama; the difference is that here she's trying to fight him off the whole time. In episode 13, after a long sequence in which he tries to gain access to a bedroom she's occupying in a property he owns, he tricks her into opening the door, and pulls her onto the bed with him, both horizontal; there he proceeds to embrace her, against both her physical resistance and her repeated verbal objections. The only difference from rape, really, is that he goes no further.

And here's the critical part: both are portrayed as *romantic* milestones for the couple; during the second, we're given her thoughts in voiceover, proving as much. This strong female lead doesn't consider sexual assault a dealbreaker.

My thought was that in English Wikipedia, it's reasonable to point out that plenty of English-speaking viewers have found these scenes more or less objectionable; a sizeable minority of those I've seen opine, including myself, found that one or both ruined the drama for them. So it's proper to warn potential viewers about it. Unfortunately, since there seems to be no "objective" source that's bothered to document this reaction (at least in English; I'd be interested to know, for example, whether the Seoul YWCA weighed in), it apparently can't be reported on the drama's own page, so I'm reporting it here instead.

Joe Bernstein joe@sfbooks.com not a registered Wikipedian, and after this unlikely to become one

205.175.116.97 (talk) 01:49, 3 March 2014 (UTC) 66.212.78.187 (talk) 02:03, 6 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Copyright problem removed edit

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://wiki.d-addicts.com/index.php?title=Secret_Garden&oldid=234055. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Moonriddengirl (talk) 23:06, 17 March 2014 (UTC)Reply


How to summarize the story edit

I believe there is no real love square since Yoon Seul and Oska are loving each other from the beginning, and Yoon Seul temporarily going for Joo Won is only for rational reasons. Also, Raíms affection for Oska is clearly fandom. There is a serious threat to Joo Won by the stunt company director though.

Anyway this all is not the main focus of the series; rather it is the main couple struggling to accept each other, and trying to find out why they are connected, why belong together, and the respective backstory.

There is not a single moment when either Joo Won or Raím think of loving anyone else, even when they hesitate if they can be together. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.182.117.187 (talk) 20:22, 29 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Secret Garden (South Korean TV series). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:04, 8 May 2017 (UTC)Reply