Talk:Second Battle of al-Faw

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Middle Eastern military history task force

Iraq Low‑importance

	Iraq portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iraq, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Iraq on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IraqWikipedia:WikiProject IraqTemplate:WikiProject IraqIraq articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Iran Low‑importance

	Iran portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Iran on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project where you can contribute to the discussions and help with our open tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Odd citation styles edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

I've noticed the article has some citations that just have numbers in brackets. I was wondering if the people who added those particular citations could add more relevant info on them? David O. Johnson (talk) 04:55, 27 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

I would guess someone just copied the whole paragraph from another source and left the old citations.--Beliar (talk) 20:21, 27 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

I find it very odd that there are multiple reference to the use of chemical weapons in this article with out the slightest hint that their use was/is prohibited under international law. Indeed, the article makes use of poison gas seem like a very clever thing to do. This should be correct ASAP. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.254.41.236 (talk) 14:33, 10 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Add topic