Talk:Sandy Newman
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sandy Newman article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Edit requested: delete from last sentence in first paragraph "serves on the board of Council for a Strong America.
editReason:I (Sandy Newman) am no longer on the board of Council for a Strong America. To confirm this, you can contact me at Sandynewman@gmail.com, or contact the President of the Council for a Strong America, dkass@councilforastrongamerica.org 96.241.52.83 (talk) 21:33, 6 September 2014 (UTC) 96.241.52.83 (talk) 00:12, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
Current Affairs and the Need for Neutrality, Comprehensiveness and No Censorship!
editBe informed that the policies WP:PROMOTION i.e. advocacy of any sort must be avoided and neutral point of view WP:NPOV must be upheld. It is especially important when current affairs and politics are discussed that on should be careful of WP:NOTCENSORED and have a more WP:COMPREHENSIVE view. From a European, maybe a more depassionate view, it is very disheartening to see that advocacy and censorship is taking a firmer grip on editors from Northern America and intertwined current affairs. Anyone with strong views on the 2016 US presidential elections for or against one candidate and is from Northern America, should think ten times over before removing or censoring well documented and relevant material. Wikipedia is not a Democracy WP:NOT#DEM, so no misuse of the WP:CONSENSUS by hitting with the "Consensus Shtick". Wikipedia is not political war zone, it is inclusive. IBestEditor (talk) 15:15, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
- Does this comment have anything to do with the content of this article? Safehaven86 (talk) 16:34, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
- There is no problem with undue weight. I agree that there should wp:notcensored and that it must be wp:comprehensive. The article about Sandy Newman is in it's beginning/infancy and anything you add that isn't basic bio, can be claimed to be "undue weight". With that premise nothing will be added if it has to fit some construed sequence & order - that just seems to be a cover for wp:promotion by the use of wp:cherrypicking. So please, hold your horses and respect wp:notcensored. PS If you want to make the sentence leaner, add something, change, don't just bulldoze it in the name of wp:promotion Mauri Kunnas (talk) 11:28, 3 December 2016 (UTC)