IBestEditor
| This is IBestEditor's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Disambiguation link notification for September 21 edit
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited David Silverman (activist), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Church and Race. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:10, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
October 2016 edit
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to John Podesta. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Neither The Catholic League nor a First Things blog are reliable sources for factual claims about a living person. Please discuss your proposed additions on the article talk page. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 17:24, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 17:26, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit
Hello, IBestEditor. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
November 2016 edit
Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 01:28, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
November 2016 - a caution edit
Do not revert other editors without a good explanation in the edit summary. You made significant reverts with no edit summary at all here and again, to the same article here. Reverting without an edit summary is considered impolite.
Also, do not revert to restore content — particularly in a biography of a living person — that has been the subject of a policy-based challenged by other editors. This is all the more true when two or three or four different editors revert one of your edits. Instead of unilaterally reverting, you should bring the discussion to the article talk page, or the appropriate noticeboard and try to gain consensus.
Please also review Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources. Generally, opinion pieces - especially on controversial subjects - are not adequate sources for factual statements made in Wikipedia's voice. Neither are polemical blogs. Neutralitytalk 01:54, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit
Hello, IBestEditor. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)