Talk:San Clemente (disambiguation)

WikiProject Disambiguation

	This page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

Requested move 16 January 2016Edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. B2C's stats are comprehensive and no one has rebutted them, only made vague assertions. Jenks24 (talk) 05:17, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

San Clemente (disambiguation) → San Clemente – I think that none is a primary topic Vivaelcelta {talk · contributions} 03:10, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Support or Oppose?Edit

Support no primary. In ictu oculi (talk) 13:30, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Oppose and speedy close - no evidence presented supporting the claim made in nom. Any such proposal should be speedy closed. I think it's just rude to make a proposal without giving participants an evidence-based argument to consider. "I think that..." doesn't cut it. Not even close. --В²C ☎ 00:17, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
- These visits may be in error to want to go to the another page. --Vivaelcelta {talk · contributions} 02:41, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Support per nom. No clear primary topic here. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:03, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
- See #Page view stats below. --В²C ☎ 18:00, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Oppose, per В²C, San Clemente, California is the primary topic; it is not located there per WP:USPLACE. © Tbhotch^™ (en-2.5). 20:43, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Page view statsEdit

It's a shame that the nom and the supporters don't even bother to look at the evidence, much less collect it and publish it for others to consider. Here's a start. It's pretty overwhelming. Maybe I'm missing something, but if I am, someone supporting this proposal needs to find it.

San_Clemente,_California has been viewed 5117 times in 201512.
San_Clemente_del_Tuyú has been viewed 213 times in 201512.
San_Clemente,_Chile has been viewed 129 times in 201512.
San_Clemente, Ecuador has been viewed 58 times in 201512.

--В²C ☎ 18:00, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.