Talk:SaleCycle

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Edelmoral in topic Notability template removal

Clarification about the subject's Draft

edit

Hi everyone, I'm making this clarification in order to step forward improving the article: I published the article in the mainspace despite the fact that was in the Afc submission process. The Draft was declined 3 times so far and 2 of them were due to my submissions due to notability issues. I cannot be responsible for the previous edits but I can say that before I handling the article it had neutrality problems and almost none reliable, third-party, independent references. I undertook this action because of the following series of events:

  • In the first declination, the reviewer's comment was: "Still needs any further available amount of in-depth third-party news sources overall".
  • I tried to reach the reviewer in order to get a clarification about its comment, with no response.
  • I tried to follow the recommendation in the comment and I added more sources, trying to stablish the notability of the subject, making my second submission.
  • Still with doubt, I ask for help and got a broader feedback. I took the recommendations and suggestions.
  • The article got its second declension about my edition, by the same reviewer, with the comment: "Frankly I simply believe it may be too soon for the applicable notability".
  • Respecting the belief of the editor, I added the {{notability|Companies|date=April 2016}} template by myself and proceeded to publish the article in the mainspace.

I know for sure that the article needs work, but I'm not a notability expert nor the right person to assure that have it (as the editor who made the changes)... I think its notable, and I warned in the mainspace about a possible notability issue, that's all.Edelmoral (talk) 09:15, 9 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Notability template removal

edit

The result of the WP:AFD discussion was Keep. The issue of the debate was the subject's Notability. The consensus reached indicate that the subject meets the primary criteria of WP:ORG, so it's notable and therefore I did remove the Notability Template of the article. Edelmoral (talk) 04:00, 23 April 2016 (UTC)Reply