Talk:Safe, sane and consensual

New section

How historically valid is this D. Stein indication???--84.152.212.133 11:57, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

Links are dead

The links in this are dead... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.187.75.183 (talk) 00:24, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Safe, sane and consensual. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20141104172615/http://www.gmsma.org/GMSMA to http://www.gmsma.org/GMSMA

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:30, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Fluff removed

Personally I don't consider this inaccurate, it's just...

Other people in the BDSM community do not consider SSC to be an accurate term for these relationships or activities. The term Risk Aware Consensual Kink (RACK) is sometimes used as a substitute description. Disagreements generally arise from the subjective nature of each term in SSC when using the term as a yardstick to evaluate activities. It can be argued that the terms in RACK are equally subjective. "How safe is safe enough?" is a legitimate question, as is "How aware is aware enough?".

...it kinda reads "Some people disagree. <a "See also" link>. Disagreements usually arise when this is disagreed upon. It can be argued that <aforementioned link> could also be disagreed with. Here's a valid interrogative statement.

Eh, ma*aaaa*ybe not in an encyclopedia? Still leaving it here if someone sees something and could rewrite it to be less... fluff xerxesbeat (talk) 17:07, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Split out

I've split this out from the BDSM article, as I think there's substantially more to be said about this.

Supporting sources:

• Langdridge, Darren; Barker, Meg (2007). Langdridge, Darren; Barker, Meg (eds.). Safe, sane and consensual: Contemporary perspectives on sadomasochism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-0-230-51774-5.
• Nielsen, Morten Ebbe Juul (2010). "Safe, Sane, and Consensual—Consent and the Ethics of BDSM". International Journal of Applied Philosophy. 24 (2): 265–288. doi:10.5840/ijap201024223.
• Wignall, Liam (2020-09-01). "Beyond safe, sane, and consensual: Navigating risk and consent online for kinky gay and bisexual men". Journal of Positive Sexuality.
• more to come

-- The Anome (talk) 17:11, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

It’s actually really simple

Any Relation between individuals and especially Kink Sex must Continually be Safe, Sane, Informed, and Consensual. And its the responsibility off everyone involved to assure it stays that way for everybody involved!!!

And in situations where this is not possible but an interaction is mandated non the less (like with care for the mentally less equipped), the relationship needs at least to be monitored and evaluated periodically, all according to the risks involved.163.158.1.136 (talk) 12:12, 10 June 2023 (UTC)