Talk:Sachin Tendulkar/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Missing citation

{{editsemiprotected}} Citation to this part "When he was young, Tendulkar would practice for hours on end in the nets. If he became exhausted, Achrekar would put a one-Rupee-coin on the top of the stumps, and the bowler who dismissed Tendulkar would get the coin. If Tendulkar passed the whole session without getting dismissed, the coach would give him the coin. Tendulkar now considers the 13 coins he won then as some of his most prized possessions."

http://www.merinews.com/catFull.jsp?articleID=145044 Sultanofhyd (talk) 14:24, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Done. Thanks! haz (talk) 18:59, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

ADAAD —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.17.147.135 (talk) 10:34, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Should IPL be in the "domestic career" section?

Seems out of place and is a big jump in the narrative. Shreevatsa (talk) 19:47, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

 Done I've boldly gone ahead and made it a new section. Shreevatsa (talk) 03:01, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

number of centuries

the number of international centuries should be changed to 96 from 94 in the introduction paragraph.

CONGRATULATIONS

Congratulations, fellow worshippers. It's a moment to be etched in stone. ReluctantPhilosopher (talk) 13:02, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

First to make 200

Abhishek sanadhya THE REVELATION

"Sachin Tendulkar underlined his reputation as the greatest player in the history of cricket by becoming the first man ever to hit a double century in ODIs, against South Africa in the second One-Day International, in Gwalior, on Wednesday 25th Feb 2010.

It was Tendulkar at his vintage best as he blazed his way to 200 from a mere 147 deliveries, inclusive of 25 boundaries, the most in a single innings and three sixes.

It is in the article. SGGH ^ping! 18:41, 24 February 2010 (UTC).

Abhishek sanadhya THE INCARNATION:

Its very difficult to Rate Little Master'SACHIN under or mere 100% with limitation, he sould be rated Greater than 100. No measurement for this Legend. I have never seen The Great Legend Donald Bradman playing, but while watching Sachin's game I would say SACHIN is the next Incarnation of GOD OF CRICKET after Donald Bradman. He is the REVELATION. No words in the Dictionary of any languages would match his fabulous performance. Even the people who do not know Cricket would praise this Greatest Legend. Hail to SACHIN. Im proud to be an INDIAN with this Great LEGEND era.SACHIN'S JOURNEY NEVER ENDS...." Britto.S

---

Cleanup Required

The opener in the article is very focused on his (numerous) achievements. It is so centred on them that it fails to mention which club he currently plays for, where he is in his career, anything about his personal life or any other part of the article. Secondly, could someone cleanup this talk page. There is a lot of forum-like chat and most of the comments can be archived. Thanks 163.1.167.64 (talk) 02:00, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Can anyone clean up and align this page.. being a new member am unable to do it.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rajesh TV (talk • contribs) 13:40, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

The of ODI ?

As in layman's use, ODI cricket refers to the men's game only. When Sachin broke the 200 run barrier, even many cricket connoisseurs hailed him as the first person ever to do so, not as the first male (Belinda Clarke passed 200 in Women's one day criket in 1997). Isn't Women's one day criket considered as "ODI Cricket"? or did the pundits just neglect the women's game? or is "ODI criket" defined as "Men's ODI criket"? I note that when statistics are shown on TV or on Cricinfo, Women's records donot find a place. As for this page we need a consensus. Define ODI Cricket (One day International Cricket) ? . Arjun⁰²⁴ 11:00, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

• Totally agree. Seeing the continuous addition and deletion of 'men's ODI' and Belinda Clark, I too wanted to bring this up for discussion to arrive at a consensus.

1.Its true that everywhere when one refers to 'ODI' it implicitly means men's ODI whereas the term "women's ODI" is explicitly mentioned to refer to the female version of the game.see this [1] and this [2] on cricinfo.com.

2.Even in other 'gender-separated' sports this convention is followed. See for ex. football and women's football, baseball and women's baseball, bodybuilding and female bodybuilding etc.

3.In almost all sports the absolute record is held by men. Except for this one I dont know any in which it is the other way around. But the records and statistics of the male and female versions of the game are not usually mixed/compared. For ex. take Belinda Clark's article itself. It mentions 'Most runs by an Australian in the World Cup (1,151)'. But then the most runs by an Australian in the world cup is actually by Ricky Ponting (1,537). [3] . So do we include the records of male players when mentioning the record of a female player ?. Clearly we dont do that. Men's cricket and Women's cricket are separate games.

4. That they are seperate games is also confirmed by this ICC classification of official cricket here. [4]. Whereas men's ODI is played according to standard ODI playing conditions, women's ODI is played according to standard women's ODI playing conditions.

So to sum up, Sachin in indeed the first person to hit a double century in ODI. and Belinda is the first person to hit a double century in women's ODI. and I think we should not compare them. However to lead the reader to Belinda's wikipage we should include a link in the 'see also' or 'footnote' sections.-Mgtm7m (talk) 16:18, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

They are separate games, but that really means that the distinguisher is needed. ODIs encompass both versions of the game, therefore it's necessary to state which specific version the record applies to. It's not the case with almost all records because the men's version records generally are higher than the women's, but in this case it isn't. —SpacemanSpiff 17:03, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Well i totally agree with Mgtm7m. "ODI Record books" only show that of men's; and women's record are separately titled as "women's ODI records", for the obvious reason that they are different games that cannot be compared in a single statistical table . This shows it's become an assumed and approved standard to take ODIs as Men's ODI; and give credit to Sachin as the first person to hit a double century in ODIs. Arjun⁰²⁴ 18:51, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

I disagree. In most sports, it is assumed that the woman is slower, throws a discus a shorter distance etc even when the object is lighter, and there has never been a woman who went faster/further/higher than the men's champion in athletics, swimming etc. But in the news, people always say "Australia's women played an ODI" not "Australia played a WODI" so there may be confusion. Men's records are higher, which is not surprising as the women's matches were played on the same grounds and it's not as easy to hit lots of boundaries, and they also play less matches so they can accumulate less, so the clarification doesn't hurt at all YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 05:47, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

Recent Edits

Why is Sachin Tendulkar being rated one of the most influential people by a famous magazine in the world not important honour? Also what is wrong the mango statement???

Here is what I am refering to: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sachin_Tendulkar&action=historysubmit&diff=359354015&oldid=359338537

Xavirules03 (talk) 06:06, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

Edit request from Veerdivam, 28 May 2010

{{editsemiprotected}} Sachin doesn'tplay only the role of a batsman, but of a bowler too. So, I think his role must be referred as an all-rounder In the right-hand side column of Sachin Tendulkar's page- his role is referred as a batsman, please edit his role to ALL-ROUNDER Veerdivam (talk) 02:59, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Allrounders are for people who bat and bowl regularly. SRT doesn't bowl regularly at all anymore, less often than a No. 11 batting, unless Ishant and Munaf are allrounders YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 03:26, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Up for debate, so request not done at this time (would need further discussion).  Chzz  ►  08:45, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

 Not done

Edit request from 120.61.9.94, 17 June 2010

{{editsemiprotected}}

sachin tendulkar's father prof.ramesh tendulkar was teaching in kirti college (dadar, Mumbai) as a lecturer and then head of department- marathi literature in the same college.sachin's name was naturally enrolled in kirti college in 1991, when he was star batsman of India.His photo also appeared in kirti college magazine of 1991 when he scored his maiden test century against england.He also played kutch-bihar trophy representing kirti college in the same year.he was felicitated by kirti college in the same year.because of his popularity and fame he faced lot of difficulty in giving his std xii exam, so the then principal asked him to give his xii exam in his cabin.

this article is edited by prof. HARSHAD BHOSALE 120.61.9.94 (talk) 15:56, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

 Not done Unless this information is published in a reliable source, it wouldn't be verifiable information to add. --Funandtrvl (talk) 18:32, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Mumbai

Why in the infobox does it say "Mumbai, India". The city wasn't officially known as Mumbai until 1995, Tendulkar was born before that date. The Madras (talk) 07:00, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Edit request from 77.99.69.64, 8 July 2010

{{editsemiprotected}} Probably the 2011 worldcup would be his last world cup to play for the Indian cricket team

77.99.69.64 (talk) 22:16, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Salvio ( ^{Let's talk 'bout it!}) 22:52, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Sachins Awards

in the awards section you forgot to mention that sachin was also part of 2008 world odi xi and 2009 world test xi —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wildkevoh (talk • contribs) 16:54, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

Master Blaster(100 Centuries)

Sachin Tendlkar scored 48 Test centuries,46 One day centuries,6 double centuries.By counting these sachin scored 100 centuries. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rajashekahr (talk • contribs) 05:02, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Edit request from A.priyadharsan, 3 September 2010

{{editsemiprotected}}

Honorary Group Captain in Indian Air Force - September 3, 2010. Please include this in his "Individual honours and appreciations" section. Thank you. A.priyadharsan (talk) 21:31, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

 Not done Please provide reliable sources for statements in articles that are about living persons and all other articles for that matter. --165.124.111.39 (talk) 23:15, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Change of Photo requested

Please change his photograph. The current photo takes a side shot and that too with a hat and sun screen all over his face. It is not recent either. In other words, it is simply a bad shot! I would suggest following images - This and This. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pratyushnidhi (talk • contribs) 17:23, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Agreed, the photo is terrible and ridiculous. -The Dude —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.55.43.87 (talk) 23:40, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Agreed 100%. Please don't do this injustice to Sachin with this kind of a photo. Change to whatever you feel better - but change it please! Can no one find a photo which is allowed to use by Wikipedia licensing requirements?

Mumbai vs bombay

I don't understand why sachin's birthplace is mentioned as bombay on wikipedia. It hurts local sentiments bigtime. Sachin tendulkar is considered as a great representative of marathi people as well as sports ambassador of India. He always calls himself to be a proud indian and mumbaikar. City's indian name has been Mumbai from its inception and it's been many years that the international english name of the city being changed to mumbai from bombay. There have been many clashes in the recent past against the british time inferiority complex representative english names like bombay, victoria terminus,bangalore etc. All are changed to local languages but unfortunately wikipedia is still showing wrong information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Amolkots (talk • contribs) 19:18, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

I agree to Amol, that we should change it to Mumbai, same as Saurav Ganguly's article shows Kolkata not Calcutta. We should always adhere to what is now, than what was. KuwarOnline ^Talk 09:22, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

I would make the point that a persons place of birth is a matter of historical record and if that country or city later changes its name that does not alter where they were born and the place should normally recorded as it was at their birth with a note as to what the place is now called. However the name of the city in question here has not changed, merely the accepted anglicisation of the name, so it is correct to use Mumbai as far as I am concerned. --LiamE (talk) 05:22, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

I think player's sports achievements are more important than birthplace. As far as birthplace issue is concerned, I think newer names should be preferred. Just imagine when people use wikipedia after 100 years, they will get totally confused to see very old names of places. Information must be updated regularly. Afterall, wikipedia is not only for gathering information but it is also for learning from it and using it for benefit of all. Awkward references to old names would start accumulating problems gradually. Also, as correctly stated by kunwar, consistancy is not maintained in using old names for all people. This is true as it is very difficult to maintain status quo. The best option is keeping all the documents updated. Being a new user, I am not entitled to make amendments in this document. Moderators should discuss and do the needful. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chamatkar (talk • contribs) 15:24, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

In this case it is the international English version of the name that has changed, not the name of the city itself. Therefore the name should be consistent and say Mumbai. Carl Sixsmith (talk) 15:28, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Er, no. It's not the international version that's changed, the city was officially "Bombay", so the official name changed. Like in every other case on Wikipedia, it is logicl that we follow standard practice and use the name that was in effect at that point in time and not an anachronistic name. —SpacemanSpiff 19:57, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

I agree. "Mumbai" as a term only became the name for the city in recent times, and when Tendulkar was born, the city was called Bombay, officially, universally. It is not "wrong information", simply information that was correct at the time of Tendulkar's birth. It should stay as Bombay. We even have the modern term in the article. Ganguly's article has "Calcutta" not Kolkata, which would have been correct officially around the time of his birth as well. The Madras (talk) 11:28, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Agree with pre-1990s Bombay, Madras, calcutta per above. Gangu was listed as K but I changed it last week YellowMonkey (new photo poll) 00:50, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

PL CHANGE SACHINS PHOTO FROM FRONT PAGE. KEEP PHOTO WHICH HAVE SACHIN HOLDING HIS BAT HIGH JUST LIKE AFTER 100 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.252.100.94 (talk) 12:48, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Please add the following into the awards and honors section

Sachin Tendulkar has won his first ICC award, the Sir Garfield Sobers Trophy, by being named the Cricketer of the Year 2010. He has also won people's Choice award for 2010. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dhiry2k (talk • contribs) 15:37, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

In the final section for 'Awards and Achievements' (the list which can be hidden and shown at the end of the article), please add ICC Cricketer of the Year (preceded by Mitchell Johnson; succeeded by Incumbent), and also LG People's Choice Player of the Year (preceded by N/A; succeeded by Incumbent). Or make a separate article for SRT's Awards and Achievements (the way it is done for Hollywood actors). 59.184.144.105 (talk) 02:28, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

Please Change the source of Records

Please change the source of Career statistics to http://www.cricinfo.com/ instead of the current cricarchive stats, which are very old and not trustworthy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Parthivtanna (talk • contribs) 06:16, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

Along those lines, is it not worth only updating stats at the end of a match - I know SRT has just got 14k Test runs, but this is bound to go up by the end of the current match? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.197.91.251 (talk) 16:26, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

Can the date of the Cricarchive citation be updated to e.g. today? Nothing that out-of-date about it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.211.83.111 (talk) 15:18, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

sachin also called as....

The God. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.181.5.226 (talk) 13:31, 16 October 2010 (UTC) 59.95.68.130 (talk) 16:47, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Edit request from 124.171.37.180, 17 October 2010

{{edit semi-protected}} "He is the only player to score a double century in the history of ODI cricket.[12][13"

Tendulkar is the only male player to score a double century in the history of ODI cricket. Belinda Clark, a female Australian cricketer was the first person to score a ODI double century, 229 not out in 1997. An external source is cricinfo (www.cricinfo.com).

As a result, please amend "He is the only player to score a double century in the history of ODI cricket.[12][13" to" He is the only male player to score a double century in the history of ODI cricket.[12][13"

124.171.37.180 (talk) 07:13, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

Done Thanks, Stickee (talk) 09:36, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

Edit request from 59.95.68.130, 22 October 2010

{{edit semi-protected}} Please replace nickname list with the updated nickname list. Add "The God" to Sachin's Nickname. Add names of his Spouse and Kids to his profile.

59.95.68.130 (talk) 16:50, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Not done: Very funny with "The God". As per his spouse and children, that is mentioned in the personal life section. Thanks, Stickee (talk) 00:07, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Edit request from 125.22.193.145, 15 November 2010

{{edit semi-protected}} It is "The God Of Cricket"

125.22.193.145 (talk) 14:07, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Not done: please be more specific about what needs to be changed. Please leave a specific request for what you want changed on the article, in the form of "Please change X to Y." Qwyrxian (talk) 05:40, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

Edit request from Konguarasan, 18 December 2010

{{edit semi-protected}} please add that he got "Crickter of the Year 2010 award" and "LG people's choice award" and this is the 1st time in his career

Requests to edit semi-protected articles must be accompanied by reference(s) to reliable sources. Chzz  ►  22:41, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

 Not done

Update of stats

{{editsemiprotected}} If you're going to update the fact he now has 50 Test centuries, please update the rest of the box with dates, and new Cricarchive date etc. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.209.107.193 (talk) 16:09, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

Current stats are M I NO Runs HS Ave 100 50 Ct India 175 286 31 14513 248* 56.91 50 59 106, should it be of interest - can't edit myself —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.209.107.193 (talk) 21:30, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

Requests to edit semi-protected articles must be accompanied by reference(s) to reliable sources. Chzz  ►  22:42, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

 Not done

Seems to me like the reference is already in the article, just needs updating. There is no reference in the lead to the fact that SRT has 50 Test centuries, does this need including then? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.41.44.144 (talk) 12:39, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Has Sachin done wicket keeping ever?

Sachin is batsman, bowler, fielder. But has he ever done wicket keeping in any match? If yes, it is worth mentioning in article with reference. Thanks! रामा (talk) 16:39, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

Tendulkar's 50th Century

Hi,

THere is a mistake in the page. In the last line of introduction it is written that he scored 50th century on 20th December. It should be 19th December 2010.

Regards Rahul

BlueStag (talk) 17:22, 19 December 2010 (UTC) 19-12-2010 10.32PM

Edit request from Waghvikrant, 19 December 2010

{{Edit semi-protected}}

Number of centuries are wrong. Original sentence "he now has 95 centuries in international cricket" in first line of second paragraph. this should be like, "he now has 96 centuries in international cricket". Waghvikrant (talk) 18:50, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

 Done - Managerarc ^talk 10:25, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, but can you also complete the edit - there are more places where his stats are mentioned in the article? (see above) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.209.107.193 (talk) 09:52, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Edit request from Thianavi, 20 December 2010

{{edit semi-protected}} Please add "The Professor" (or) "The Professor of Batting" to Nicknames. Source http://www.sportinglife.com/cricket/news/story_get.cgi?STORY_NAME=cricket/10/12/20/CRICKET_South_Africa_Tendulkar.html

Thianavi (talk) 07:34, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

Done. Seems a bit excessive, but in the spirit of WP:BRD, I have added it. Other editors migth remove it, or trim them. I used the shorter version. Thanks,  Chzz  ►  22:22, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

 Done

"The professor" didn't sound familiar to me, so i have took the liberty of removing it. Moreover, there seems to be a clutter with his nicks, and some editors seem to like adding all the nicks the commentators yell at the spur of the moment. I am thinking, we limit the no:of nicknames to 4-5 most popular ones for the sake of brevity. Arjun^codename024 08:37, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

The greatest batsman ever: Bradman or Tendulkar?

According to The Sydney Morning Herald poll on "The greatest batsman ever: Bradman or Tendulkar?" 67% people choose Sachin as greatest bastman over Bradman (33%) Ref1. I think it worth adding to article. KuwarOnline ^Talk 12:01, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

Twitter

THis is getting tireseome, this is an encyclopaedia article and it's getting to become a fanboy piece with extensive material on his twitter feed and whether or not that will soon become the most followed twitter id in India and such. Please refrain from adding such content. —SpacemanSpiff 11:14, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Now Fixed i guess. SyberGod (chat) 04:55, 30 October 2024 UTC [refresh]

Nothing's been fixed, it's just partly removed, more than one line is completely undue. BTW, you're way over 3RR, so I hope you will self-revert to the version four users reverted to. —SpacemanSpiff 11:44, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

No it is not fixed. I have reverted him per WP:BRD. DO NOT re add it unless it is agreed upon here. What does "part of online presence" has to do with inclusion in an encyclopedic article. This should have a one line mention in the "fan following" section. A whole section on Twitter is undue. What next? a section each for sachin on facebook/orkut?. --Sodabottle (talk) 12:35, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

@spaceman

lol this is called blackmail.....

I believe "Sachin on Twitter" is a valuable contribution to popular culture , if comments of people like Ian Chappell can take a place in a wiki page on Sachin , topic on Sachin's Official Twitter account is no less to it.

@sodabottle it is the only online presence Sachin has , do not blank untill issue gets settled here SyberGod (chat) 04:55, 30 October 2024 UTC [refresh]

As the person adding the content, you are the one, who shouldn't readd until the issue gets settled here.--Sodabottle (talk) 04:03, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

good man —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.96.143.163 (talk) 08:30, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Edit request from Varunc, 29 December 2010

{{edit semi-protected}}

Hi, Request to change the existing picture. A good one is available at http://wallpapers99.com/Sachin_Tendulkar/800x600-32093.htm Thanks

Varunc (talk) 19:03, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Not done: You have to upload the image to Wikipedia with a free license. →♠Gƒoley↔Four♣← 20:07, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Personal Information

Santu47 (talk) 12:11, 25 June 2011 (UTC)santhosh

I think there is much info. to be added at the personnel info. record such as: Country Residency Place of Birth

Twitter

Adding a topic about Sachin's Twitter Account.

SyberGod (talk) 14:20, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Just one line with twitter id please. Elaborate info may be removed. Thanks! रामा (talk) 14:36, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Yes add a sourced one line to the "fan following" section. anything more is undue--Sodabottle (talk) 15:10, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Alright,Most of the Topics are written as if it is a time line !!!! SyberGod (talk) 16:10, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

any one ready to rewrite this whole article ? SyberGod (talk) 17:54, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

no one because there are only people who revert contributions , the easy way , who are no better than spammers ! SyberGod (talk) 03:34, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

I have reduced the twitter section to single line mention as agreed upon my a number of editors before.--Sodabottle (talk) 03:45, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

how many editors first opposed ? 100 ?

SyberGod (talk) 06:21, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

There were atleast four who reverted you the time you got blocked for editwarring, one more in the edit request you posted and Now Nev1 opposes it. So that makes 6. And that is enough to establish consensus against adding a whole new section.--Sodabottle (talk) 06:36, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Edit request from 59.163.51.132, 4 January 2011

{{edit semi-protected}}

59.163.51.132 (talk) 09:59, 4 January 2011 (UTC)±

• Not done: Request is blank. Alpha Quadrant ^talk 17:12, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Mockery of the article

If you're going to update constantly, please make sure all the cites are also updated. The profile currently has a cite of August 2010, but has stats in the info-box as of SRT's dismissal in the current Test, January 2011. Why even bother having the citation there? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.209.107.225 (talk) 20:19, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Edit request from Rahulsam0511, 4 January 2011

{{edit semi-protected}} Please add "Ujala Technobright" to endorsed products. Ref: watch TV

http://marketingpractice.blogspot.com/2010/07/brand-update-ujala-techno-bright.html

Rahulsam0511 (talk) 20:34, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Wikipedia does not consider blogs to be reliable sources. -Atmoz (talk) 00:04, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

 Done Jyothy Labs As you can see, Sachin indeed endorses Ujala Techno Bright.--ashwinikalantri ^talk 15:29, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Edit request

{{Edit semi-protected}}

Please either update the stats citation in the infobox to the appropriate date, or revert the stats to those that were appropriate at the date mentioned. Either way at the moment it seems like wiki has fortold the future, and we all know this is not the case.

Done I've updated the date and several statistics. We really need a bot for this kind of thing. Thanks, Adrian J. Hunter^{(talk•contribs)} 04:15, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks yourself. Seems to make a mockery of the locked article status if "reputable" editors can still edit part of an article without updating other relevant bits, I see several requests above turned down due to not simply being in the right format. I'm not sure how a bot can help here :( . I'm all for assuming good faith, but it needs to work both ways. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.208.218.159 (talk) 10:47, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Ferrari

The article has a lot about a car Tendulkar got in 2002. Is this really worth mentioning, especially in this much detail? Nev1 (talk) 20:47, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

If there is a controversy section, this issue should get a prominent part in it (atleast half). This was huge at that time and he hasn't been involved in any other non-cricket controversies. The issue got raised in the Indian parliament and there were even attempts to change the law to accomodate his request. --Sodabottle (talk) 20:53, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Fair enough. I'm not sure there should be a separate section just for controversies though; incidents can be woven into the main narrative of the article. That way they are presented in context and aren't given undue weight. Nev1 (talk) 20:57, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

I agree that it was pretty huge news, but is it in the context of Tendulkar or in the context of the Government of India? If I remember correctly, almost all the criticism was of GoI for exempting a personal gift from customs duty while not doing the same for social activities etc. —SpacemanSpiff 10:45, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

Edit request from Adigatvr, 11 February 2011

{{edit semi-protected}} Please add : in Individual honours and appreciations : In 2011, Mysore University (Karnataka) has honored honorary Doctorate Adigatvr (talk) 10:41, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

Source? Nev1 (talk) 19:54, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. -Atmoz (talk) 21:16, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

Edit request from Tuffer77, 13 February 2011

{{edit semi-protected}} The innings of 241 brought in the concept of self control, where he decided not to play anything on the off side. Most of the commentators and the critics did mention that he is vulnerable on the off side. Sachin ensured that he will leave the ball alone, on every ball off side. This controlled innings is still talked about as an innings with self control. http://www.cricages.com/sachin-zone/the-innings-241-gives-birth-for-sachinism/ Tuffer77 (talk) 14:40, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. I don't think that qualifies as a reliable source. Please see how to identify reliable sources. -Atmoz (talk) 15:41, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Edit request from 77.99.69.64, 17 February 2011

{{edit semi-protected}} Sachin Ramesh Tendulkar won the NDTV Indian of the year 2011. 77.99.69.64 (talk) 17:43, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. If you have a reliable source, please make a new edit request with that information. Qwyrxian (talk) 03:06, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Mother

Does this man have no mother? I have seen her name as Rajni. Myrvin (talk) 19:14, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

I found a source and put her in. Myrvin (talk) 15:33, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Edit request from Adigatvr, 23 February 2011

{{edit semi-protected}} Individual Hounours & Awards: 1) Mysore University (Karnataka) to honour Sachin with Doctorate: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/sports/cricket/series-tournaments/sachin-tendulkars-half-century-of-centuries/Mysore-University-to-honour-Sachin-with-doctorate/articleshow/7262090.cms

2)Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences (RGUHS)(Karnataka) to honour Sachin with Doctorate: http://www.deccanchronicle.com/bengaluru/rguhs-doctorate-master-blaster-241

Adigatvr (talk) 05:58, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Done -Atmoz (talk) 17:37, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Edit request from 207.35.34.66, 25 February 2011

{{edit semi-protected}} <HTML>he is a srilankan

207.35.34.66 (talk) 22:03, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Baseball Watcher 22:35, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Edit request from Da1entertainment, 27 February 2011

{{edit semi-protected}}

A tribute song was done for Sachin during 2011 world cup by ISR(Inder Singh Randhawa) and Jackson International who presented Arnie B's "Master Blaster"! Arnie B is a playback singer for Sajid-Wajid in "peter gaya kaam se".This tribute song has been seen on TV, heard on Radios, popular websites such as smashits.com and saavn, and was also in a list of "most shared videos on facebook" .Here is the youtube link http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dj2uO4Mp7Kk

Da1entertainment (talk) 19:32, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Sachin becomes first player to score 200 runs in ODI

Sachin Tendulkar is thr only batsman to score a double century in One Day International {ODI}.He was unbeaten on 200 against South Africa. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Valarian06 (talk • contribs) 08:57, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Please remove the individual Fan photo from the page (Sudhir Kumar Chaudhary)

What does this photo do here on Sachin's page? I don't think it is important enough to get a place here.

• Shows his fanatic fan following. Around The Globe^{सत्यमेव जयते} 09:58, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Are you spotfixing?

How did CricketArchive know in January that SRT's total ODI runs as of now would be 17777? Please, please, please don't forget to update everything when you decide to update stats!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.208.60.178 (talk) 18:24, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

And some more. Please don't just update parts of the article if you decide you need to update stats —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.197.91.203 (talk) 19:47, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

RANKINGS and opening paragraph

Sachin in 2003 was actually Ranked the best ODI batsmen in front of Viv Richards. This should be mentioned instead of his second best.

http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/content/story/128517.html

Imagine how far ahead he would be now based on performance and longevity (which is what wisden used to formulate such rankings). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.197.150.104 (talk) 00:08, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Subtitles in International cricket section

I think this section needs to be rewritten - has too many sub-sections - especially in the second half. Every series does not need a sub-section! Around The Globe^{सत्यमेव जयते} 09:59, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Career Achievements

It says in this section he has 51 test centuries and 47 ODI centuries, he now has 48 ODI centuries as of march 12 where he scored a century against south africa in the 2011 world cup. Actually, somebody has edited other parts in the article to reflect that, but not this section. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.135.100.102 (talk) 17:47, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Lead section too statistic heavy

I think the Lead section is too statistic heavy. The second paragraph does not need to be in there (in my opinion). I think the first paragraph says it well enough (stuff like ~considered best ever player... ~holder of many records). I think just chop it off completely and either leaving just the first paragraph, or adding some other information (it is a big article). Cheers --Boy.pockets (talk) 10:57, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Edit request from 68.5.98.145, 2 April 2011

Last ODI 02 April 2011 v Sri Lanka

68.5.98.145 (talk) 23:06, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

Already done -- gtdp ^(T)/_(C) 10:25, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Can we get a better picture?

This one looks incredibly goofy. There should be better ones featuring him and the Cup, so speaks rohith. 11:56, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Looks kinda photoshopped too, so speaks rohith. 11:59, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Definitely needs a new picture. one with the world cup and the gateway of india background is a good contender. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rahulkeswani (talk • contribs) 20:03, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

It needs to meet the Image use policy. This site has to follow US laws, which are much stricter about copyright than people are in India. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 21:56, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Yes, I know that, but it's difficult to imagine ONLY THIS picture of Sachin is meeting the current 'US' standards. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.185.166.227 (talk) 14:09, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

Change

I think many consider him the greatest batsman of all time. Bradman may be great but he played at a time when no one knew how to play cricket properly and the level of competition and expectancy was far lower. Sachin's records prove that he is the greatest. I also think his list of achievments need to be organized into some sort of table instead of being clumped together in the introductory paragrapgh. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.164.220.42 (talk) 18:16, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Edit request from Svivekkrishna, 4 April 2011

{{edit semi-protected}}

The number of ODI centuries have been put at 47 under Career Achievements. It should be 48. Svivekkrishna (talk) 16:58, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

Done. Apparently this had to be done via a template. I'm sure there's a good reason... Nev1 (talk) 17:07, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

ADD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

plz start with/add in the introductory paragraph- Sachin Tendulkar is a world cup winning cricketer........................--Manujya (talk) 06:28, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

 Done added to lede. Around The Globe^{सत्यमेव जयते} 11:00, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Tendulkar's restaurant photo

Is there a need for this picture ? That too with some stranger posing who has no relation to Sachin Tendulkar whatsoever ?

I recommend removing this until we find a better picture, that is if we do need a picture of his restaurant. And if we do need it, how about a picture of the interior rather than just the signboard. Ninadhardikar (talk) 13:19, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Your reasoning pretty much hits the nail on the head for me and I've gone ahead and removed the photo. I don't think it adds much to the article, but as you say an image of the interior would have more value. Nev1 (talk) 14:42, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Follower of Sathya Sai Baba

I think there should be a section about this. On Sai baba's death, Sachin cancelled his birthday celebrations, flew to Saibaba's ashram (with his wife and Sunil Gavaskar) and cried at the side of the dead body. please see http://www.hindustantimes.com/The-master-mourns-his-guru/Article1-689677.aspx —Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.231.82.221 (talk) 04:46, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Edit request from Stanoel, 4 May 2011

I would like to edit the section http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SR_Tendulkar#2011_World_Cup because there are more statistics and useful cricket match information about Sachin Tendulkar that needs to be added in that section. The information is from these links below and these are the sources.

http://www.espncricinfo.com/icc_cricket_worldcup2011/engine/current/match/433606.html

http://www.espncricinfo.com/icc_cricket_worldcup2011/engine/match/433605.html

http://www.espncricinfo.com/icc_cricket_worldcup2011/engine/match/433601.html

http://www.espncricinfo.com/icc_cricket_worldcup2011/engine/match/433582.html

http://www.espncricinfo.com/icc_cricket_worldcup2011/engine/match/433599.html

http://www.espncricinfo.com/icc_cricket_worldcup2011/engine/match/433586.html

http://www.espncricinfo.com/icc_cricket_worldcup2011/engine/match/433578.html

http://www.espncricinfo.com/icc_cricket_worldcup2011/engine/match/433568.html

http://www.espncricinfo.com/icc_cricket_worldcup2011/engine/match/433558.html

Stanoel (talk) 07:49, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Note: you'll be able to edit the article once you become autoconfirmed. In the meantime, if there is something specific you want to change let us know. Cheers! — Bility (talk) 16:37, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Edit request from 123.236.34.24, 18 May 2011

I want to edit the article Sachin Ramesh TENDULKAR Please allow me ! DiVANSH (talk) 14:41, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

You just did. Nev1 (talk) 14:58, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Change the display picture!!!

Its high time the display picture in the biobox is changed to one that gives a much clearer view of his face(http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sachin_Tendulkar1.jpg for instance) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.186.9.78 (talk) 13:06, 19 May 2011 (UTC) Or http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sachin_Tendulkar_with_World_Cup.jpg , which I'm sure 99% of all users would like to see at the display picture for the article —Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.186.9.78 (talk) 13:16, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

Too many pix in Sachin Tendulkar#Gallery?

Hi all - I'm getting caption-fatigue here. Could we possibly discuss which ones should be kept and which ones should be culled? --Shirt58 (talk) 10:58, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

At the very least the ones already used in the article should be got rid of, but in any case I'm not really sure the gallery is very adds much in any case. The commons link at the bottom of the article is intended to include photos and the like related to Tendulkar and does the same job, albeit one click further away. There's space in the article for more appropriate images related to the text, particularly early on, but I'd be tempted to remove the gallery altogether. Nev1 (talk) 11:46, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Comment on recent GA nomination

While it is not strictly a criteria that the person who nominates an article be one of the main contributors, that Sehmeet singh (talk · contribs) has not made a single edit to the article or cosulted other editors is a bad idea. Having contributed to the article, I have concerns about the sourcing and don't believe the problems can be quickly addressed. There is a clear issue of balance, not necessarily POV but in putting things in proportion. The article has 1,000 words on Tendulkar's international career between 1989 and 1999, in which time he played 73 Tests and over 200 ODIs. In contrast there are nearly 1,600 words on the year 2007 to 2010, covering 42 Tests and 68 ODIs. Something is clearly not right. The Champions League T20, in the grand scheme of things a domestic competition which does not have the same significance as an international series, has its own stubby section. The planning behind the article is non-existant, and it shows in its haphazarrd structure. The international and the domestic are treated separately as if they never interacted, which goes against common sense as when international cricketers lose form they return to their clubs to refind it. There are also entire paragraphs which are unsourced. These are not minor issues and are obvious without wasting a reviewer's time. I suggest that nomination be withdrawn. Nev1 (talk) 19:50, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

When I saw the GA nom I was going to check with you on that as I didn't want an unnecessary failed GA note in the article history/milestones, but I got tied up with other matters and didn't expect the review so soon. Oh well. —SpacemanSpiff 21:14, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

My concern was wasting a reviewer's time with an article that still requires a lot of editing to get it up to GA standards. Harrias' review was prompt and I hope it didn't take too much time. Nev1 (talk) 21:19, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Review didn't take long at all, and was along similar lines: a "nip it in the bud" thing. As I stated in the review, I have high hopes that this article will get to FA one day, but I think as long as he is playing the article is likely to be too unstable to manage that. But we'll see! Harrias ^talk 07:10, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

GA? Seriously? Kinda half baked at the moment, maybe someone can start work on it so that it can feature the day he receives a Bharat Ratna. Around The Globe^{सत्यमेव जयते} 14:15, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Sachin Tendulkar - Honorary Group Captain.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Sachin Tendulkar - Honorary Group Captain.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations What should I do? Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 22:12, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Please include details about "Tendulkar Opus" which is his latest biography. It costs $75,000 (£49,000) and there are only 10 copies made which are already sold. With more than 1,500 pictures, the "Tendulkar Opus" biography will weigh 37kg (80lb) and each of its 852 pages will be edged in gold leaf, also conatining a drop of blood of Sachin Tendulkar. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.156.17.89 (talk) 17:25, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Edit request from 117.254.121.170, 26 September 2011

117.254.121.170 (talk) 11:47, 26 September 2011 (UTC) Sachin Tendulkar is the first indian who was the cover photo of TIME MAGAZINE in 1999 which was not attained that status by any other indian before.............

Not seeing this at the TIME website here or here. Could you possibly give more info? --Shirt58 (talk) 12:17, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Not done: please be more specific about what needs to be changed. Dynamic|cimanyD contact me ⁞ my edits 16:56, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Bowling

The bowling information under style of play needs a little work. I deleted the words "with equal ease" after his three styes of bowling as uncited opinion. The citation for his having influenced games with wis bowling "on more than one occassion" is a report on a single match. The information on his bowling is, I think, basically correct, just need better citing. Epeeist smudge (talk) 10:55, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

Edit request from , 9 November 2011

Controversy in Earning Assets

Sachin with irrespective of his assets he stands at the first place for his earnings compared to any sportsmen in India. Infact his remuneration is 1.5 crores to shoot in the add campaign and also he additionally charges 6 crores for broadcasting the ad for the entire year. Sachin is now brand ambasodor for 20 Corporate Companies in India. 125.16.95.33 (talk) 10:08, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

 Not done Needs proper sources. --Commander _{(Ping Me)} 12:17, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Sachin Tendulkar Nickname Master Blaster

Sachin is widely known as Master Blaster. I doubt why it is not added under his Nicknames in Infobox. I've seen this in and article in wikipedia. Please verify this and add it if its right.Forgive me if its wrong. Abdul raja (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 15:12, 9 November 2011 (UTC).

The infobox currently has three nicknames: "Little Master", "Tendlya", and "The God of Cricket". The first two are sourced to Tendulkar's Cricinfo profile, and the latter (slightly less reliably IMO) to bollywood.com. It is important to include sources when adding material to articles so that the information can be checked. "Master Blaster" seems a bit too close to "Little Master" for me to think they're both worth including. To be honest, I'm tempted to follow Cricinfo's path and just go for two, getting rid of "The God of Cricket". They will have had the same issue and have decided not to list every single one. I can't say why, but faced with the matter here I just don't think a long list of nicknames is helpful, and lots of them appear pretty similar. This from a few months ago was ludicrous. Nev1 (talk) 15:29, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Thanks Nev1 for your view. I thought of adding Master Blaster since its more famous name than Little Master.As you said reference is very important to us and Nickname is not the only important thing in the Article. I'll try to find a reliable reference for this issue. Abdul raja (talk) 16:47, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

I found some articles in Internet which calls Sachin Tendulkar as The Master Blaster. I've added this here for your reference. Please verify it. [5] [6] [7]

I hope these are enough references to call Sachin - The Master Blaster Abdul raja (talk) 06:28, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

this is great.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.249.178.172 (talk) 12:55, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

International Information

Possibility of information being incorrect Rahul Dravid page says debut 20 June 1996 v England and cap 150 and Sachin Tendulkar page says debut 1989 and cap 187

That does not seem possible — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amit usual (talk • contribs) 15:29, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Done I have fixed it. Have a look.--Vyom25 (talk) 07:04, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

Edit request on 19 December 2011

www.sachinist.com Its most views Sachin Tendulkar fan site with all the updates its good for fans if you can update this link in article, as current links that are posted in this article are not updated at regular basis

Sachiislife (talk) 07:54, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

It doesn't seem to be an official site, and in any case the current links to yahoo and cricinfo profiles (the latter of which is always up to date) are sufficient. Nev1 (talk) 23:49, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Edit request on 20 December 2011

The 1999 WC Tragedy and an Innings of Character!

Sachislife (talk) 01:08, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

No real request, not an RS to add either. —SpacemanSpiff 05:17, 20 December 2011 (UTC)