Talk:SS America (1939)

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Moons of Io in topic Something is wrong here

Designed by women

edit

Regarding the following passage:

One little known fact is that America was one of the few ocean liners, American or otherwise, that had been designed by women. There were few women working in maritime design, and America's women designers created a warm and rich American atmosphere. The stodginess and overwrought decor from liners past was jettisoned to create a friendly ship. Interior design and furniture were installed to provide an atmosphere of Yankee lightness, cheerfulness and sophisticated charm.

Could someone please provide a source for this claim? Nothing against women or the contributor, but this is the first I've ever heard of this. SchuminWeb (Talk) 03:28, 24 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

And it sounds a little feminist to me. Perhaps it should be removed until a source can be found? Alphabet55 (talk) 17:01, 10 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
  • I agree. Perhaps a rewrite is in order to remove biased wording? I'll see what I can do with it. 216.183.234.7 (talk) 14:05, 5 July 2008 (UTC) Oops, forgot to sign in. I'm going to move that section to the design and construction area of the article, where I believe that it is much more relevant than its current place. Clegs (talk) 14:07, 5 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

WWII

edit

I am reinserting the WWII section. All that text comes from the public domain Dictionary of American Naval Fighting Ships database. Here is the link: http://www.history.navy.mil/danfs/w6/west_point-ii.htm Zurel Darrillian 13:30, 11 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

References

edit

Suggest removing Schumin Web references. This is not a reputable resource and the page no longer exists. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.119.133.134 (talkcontribs)

Removed. SchuminWeb (Talk) 18:08, 19 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

the Nazi spies?

edit

is this really relevant to the story of the ship? that she carried two Nazi spies? i am sure she carried a few members of Israeli intel too. Statesboropow (talk) 05:30, 30 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

In 1941, she carried two Nazi spies from the Duquesne Spy Ring in her crew: Erwin Wilhelm Siegler and Franz Joseph Stigler. Both men were charged by the FBI with espionage and sentenced to 10 years and 16 years' imprisonment, respectively.

this part isnt relevant at all. i took it out. it looks just like another lame attempt to tell the world about Nazi Germany. How many members of the IRA rode on the ship? Statesboropow (talk) 03:47, 30 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

But they weren't CARRIED, atleast one of them was a part of the crew of the ship, which makes it relevant. --DraconianDebate (talk) 14:15, 5 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Disruptive and irrelevant to the story of the ship. Take it out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.203.96.253 (talk) 17:04, 14 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

maiden voyage

edit

The Wikipedia page says the SS America started her maiden voyage on August 22, 1940. However, I have an envelope stating it is from the maiden voyage and the stamps are cancelled on August 14, 1940 in Puerto Rico. 76.176.135.89 (talk) 22:55, 23 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

"fixed". According to Darren Byrne's extensive information (see ref.) she returned on August 22. Byrne writes the maiden voyage was bound for San Juan (Puerto Rico) which suits your report very well, too. Ardik (talk) 23:08, 26 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Further Reading additions

edit

Miller, W. (1991). Ss united states : the story of America's greatest ocean liner . New York, NY: W.W. Norton.

This book give intersting facts on the Liner as it compared to both other liners and ships of the era. This is the reason that I selected this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chrispy824 (talkcontribs) 17:59, 24 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

You know that the SS United States is not the same ship? Britmax (talk) 06:35, 27 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Born on the SS America

edit

Is there anyone out there that has any info about me. My name is David and i was born in 1960 on the SS America. My Email Is (redacted) My cell number is (redacted). I hope to hear form you if you know anything about me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.233.23.113 (talk) 00:57, 17 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

conflict

edit

48 hours after grounding the ship broke in two. In 2007 the ship broke in half. These terms mean the same thing so would someone correct the confusion? Otr500 (talk) 10:46, 6 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

1939 or 1940?

edit

The article starts by "SS America was an ocean liner built in 1940", and the Spanish, Russian, French, German versions of this article read "1940" in the title. However, English version reads "1939". Should this be modified?

--Maku17 (talk) 15:46, 10 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Yes because 1940 was when she was completed. America4094 (talk) 21:54, 22 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Then why does it still say 1939, I am formally asking for a name change to SS America (1940).Slatersteven (talk) 10:41, 11 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Wrecked at Fuerteventura (1994–2013)

edit

There's no explanation as to why this is a year range rather than a simple year. The final date mentioned is 2007. If something happened in 2013 to change the ship's status, it needs an explanation. The date is likely derived from the note added to the [Sometimes Interesting article] that mentioned it was no longer visible on Google Maps as of 2013. I'm adding that, but it doesn't describe a definitive event for the ship, so I'm removing '2013' from the heading. 0x69494411 14:14, 7 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Venture Cruises photo

edit

Shouldn't it be mentioned that the Venture Cruises photo is not an actual 1978 photo, it is a retouched photo of the ship as Australis? I don't mind it's inclusion in the article, at least until an authentic one is added. (After all, photos of her from this time are hard to find.) I believe the original uploader is also who created it, please see https://matthewcox.deviantart.com/art/S-S-America-in-1978-661779032. Elsquared (talk) 01:58, 30 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 15 external links on SS America (1939). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:07, 8 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:36, 16 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:08, 21 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:08, 21 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Something is wrong here

edit

It was decommissioned in the 1940s, but it was still in service for more decades. Can someone correct this.49.178.144.162 (talk) 10:08, 26 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

She was decommissioned in 1946, that is her career in the US navy ceased. She continued in service from then on in private hands. Moons of Io (talk) 20:16, 26 April 2023 (UTC)Reply