Talk:SMS Fuchs

(Redirected from Talk:SMS Fuchs (1860))
Latest comment: 8 days ago by Hog Farm in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:SMS Fuchs/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Parsecboy (talk · contribs) 12:17, 29 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 02:44, 31 October 2024 (UTC)Reply


I'll review this one later this week. Hog Farm Talk 02:44, 31 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

  • Do you think it would be useful to have a link for the rifled terminology?
    • Good idea
  • "During this period, she joined her the gunboats Camäleon" - something has gone wrong here
    • Fixed
  • "Fuchs then served as a tender in Wilhelmshaven while the defensive mine barriers protecting the approaches to the Jade" - I don't think this is grammatical
    • Probably something that got rewritten one too many times ;)
  • "Her sailing rig was removed and a simple pole mast was fitted for signaling purposes." - is it known when the sailing rig had been re-installed after it was removed during the original period of inactivity?
    • No, unfortunately

I'll do the source checks once this is complete; I still have the Groner source scan in my email. Hog Farm Talk 00:57, 1 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks again, HF! Parsecboy (talk) 19:17, 1 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
  • "She was then struck from the naval register on 14 November." - source check is accurate
  • "Fuchs was 41.2 meters (135 ft 2 in) long overall, with a beam of 6.69 m (21 ft 11 in) and a draft of 2.2 m (7 ft 3 in)." - source check is accurate
  • "The ship was armed with a battery of one rifled 24-pounder muzzle-loading gun and two rifled 12-pounder muzzle-loading guns" - source check is accurate

No issues with the above; promoting. Hog Farm Talk 20:35, 2 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.