Talk:SKY Latin America

Latest comment: 12 years ago by AMAPO in topic Article's factual accuracy is disputed
WikiProject iconDisambiguation
WikiProject iconThis disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.

Availability

edit

I removed the following line from the article page:

"It's still growing and is now available in the southern U.S., where the Hispanic population is at its highest."

I am unaware of any companies selling SKY LA services anywhere in the US. The satellite footprint does indeed overlap part of the southern US, but getting a subscription in the US is a different issue. If I'm incorrect, please restore the statement to the main page and provide a cite. Rjhatl (talk) 03:48, 28 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Article's factual accuracy is disputed

edit

This whole article is wrong. SKY Latin America doesnt exist anymore. SKY Latin America sold all its assets to DirecTV Latin America. All that remained was SKY Mexico which supplies service to Central America and Dominican Republic and Sky Brazil of which each are seperately owned by three different companies. Search for Sky Latin America or SKY America Latina and I will assure you that there is no official web page and nothing will show up. To save article we should split this one into two SKY Mexico and Sky Brazil. AMAPO (talk) 07:46, 25 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for clearing that up, but don't forget to WP:FIXDABLINKS. All the other Wikipedia articles that contain links to this page now need to be fixed to link to the correct article. Your help in completing this task will be appreciated. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 10:24, 28 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
You're welcome, I'll complete that in the next two days.
-AMAPO (talk) 10:35, 28 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
Nevermind already completed. AMAPO (talk) 14:23, 28 June 2011 (UTC)Reply