Talk:Runnymede-class large landing craft

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

typo? edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Is the Macon (LCU 2003) the only one of her 35 sister ships with the prefix USAT, instead of USAV? Or is this an error? - thewolfchild 06:58, 8 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

I corrected it because it is USAV for "US Army Vessel" and I have actually been on board the Macon.

I was stationed on board the Runnymede and the Aldie for a number of deployments in the late '90s early 2000s and this class of LCU was always called the "2000 class LCU" , therefore the hull numbers starting with 2001 and up. Why does this page call them the Runnymede-class? Runnymede is only the name of the first one built. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.97.49.213 (talk) 22:43, 27 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Add topic