Talk:Royal Society of Ulster Architects

Learn more about this page

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Ireland Low‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.
	An image is requested for this article as its inclusion will substantially increase the significance of the article. Please remove the `image-needed` parameter once the image is added.

Architecture High‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I feel that RSUA and its President should be in two separate articles. Over time these will naturally expand, with the President article listing significant features of each presidency, and the RSUA article including more general information. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 83.141.100.175 (talk • contribs) 08:51, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

Proposed merge of RSUA Silver Medal into Royal Society of Ulster Architects

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

The following discussion is closed and will soon be archived: outcome was: merged/redirected

Does not warrant its' own article. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 21:24, 2 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Support merge/redirect - a search turned up no significant RS coverage of this award.Dialectric (talk) 17:58, 3 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

I have redirected RSUA Silver Medal to this article. It was a brief stub with no referenced content or refs to merge.Dialectric (talk) 14:13, 25 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed merge of Perspective Magazine into Royal Society of Ulster Architects

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments1 person in discussion

The following discussion is closed and will soon be archived: outcome was: merged/redirected

Very similar to the proposed "medal" merger above, I propose to merge/redirect Perspective Magazine (the journal of the subject org) into this article (on the subject org). I propose this because pretty much every WP:MERGEREASON applies. In terms of content, the magazine article effectively verbatim duplicates the same content we find here. In terms of context, it's not really possible to separate the journal and the org. And, in terms of the length of the text, the magazine article has effectively contained the same 70 words since it was created (almost 17 years ago) and would be difficult to expand without further overlapping with the org that produces/publishes it. WP:PRODUCT and related guidelines would also seem to apply. Guliolopez (talk) 20:52, 7 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Resolved OK. As it has been some time since my note above, and as no other thoughts/suggestions have been raised, I've gone ahead with the proposed merge and related redirect. As noted, the content in the target section has barely changed (other than to add the missing refs). As the section and sub-topic article were near identical (with WP:OVERLAPing context and largely WP:DUP content). Guliolopez (talk) 15:15, 17 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic