Talk:Royal Lincolnshire Regiment

Merge

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

After 3.5 years of open discussion, it does not appear that consensus has formed for merging the two articles in question. Discussion closed. WTF? (talk) 23:16, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

---

I've proposed merging the 10th Regiment of Foot into this article, as the two articles describe the same unit - one up to 1881, one 1881 onwards. The unit didn't change in 1881, unlike most Army regiments; the 26th Regiment and upwards were merged, but the 1st to 25th merely got new names and absorbed new reserve/volunteer battalions. In effect, there's complete continuity between them, and there's no need to separate the articles. Shimgray | talk | 01:57, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

I agree. This Regiment later became the 1st and 2nd Battalions of the Lincolnshire Regiment in 1881. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tempaire (talk • contribs) 21:58, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Can this be closed now? There's been no objection to this proposal, and (as you say) the same format is used in other, similar, articles, so I would suggest if you still wish to go ahead with it. Moonraker12 (talk) 17:53, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

There was obviously an objection as someone removed the merge tag from the article. Keith D (talk) 19:45, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Merge

I don't believe that there were any objections to the above proposal: the merge tag was probably just removed after 3.5 years due to lack of interest. I have completed the merge as there was huge duplication between the two articles. Dormskirk (talk) 22:43, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Royal Lincolnshire Regiment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.regiments.org/regiments/uk/inf/010Lincs.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:06, 2 April 2016 (UTC)