This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
What do we have on her that isn't on her husband's page? a death date, various forms of her name, and some speculation about who her parents might have been. And for sources we have one hobbyist's self-published collection of genealogical charts. That is not notability, and that is why I redirected. Nothing hasty about it. Agricolae (talk) 11:22, 29 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
Let me just add that the name of this page accepts as fact the parentage for Rotrude that the article itself called only speculation. i.e. she was Rotrude of Trier if, and only if, she was daughter of Leudwinus, bishop of Trier (and even then, it is odd to name assign a woman to the location of her father's episcopal see, rather than, say, Treves where he was count). even were there to be an article on this obscure woman, it shouldn't be under this namespace. Agricolae (talk) 15:25, 30 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
