Talk:Roman Africa

Latest comment: 10 hours ago by Cynwolfe in topic What is this page?
WikiProject iconDisambiguation
WikiProject iconThis disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.

What is this page?

edit

Having just categorized this page, then changed it to a disambiguation page having seen the banner on this talk page, I looked at the history and see that its purpose and format has changed a few times. I suggest discussing options here and seeking concensus before making any further changes. Derek Andrews (talk) 23:30, 26 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

My initial reaction is that Wikipedia:Broad-concept article would be the correct format to use here, replacing the bullet lists with regular paragraphs and wikilinks. I will check first to see if there are any other articles that already do this under another name. Derek Andrews (talk) 23:35, 26 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
@Derek Andrews: I like the idea of a WP:BCA rather than a DAB page. I think that would be much more useful to readers. It shouldn't need more than a screen or so to give a broad-brush story of Roman involvement in Africa from the Punic Wars through the establishment of Africa (Roman province) and the acquisition of Egypt (Roman province), to decline and the Vandal and Muslim conquests, leaving little Roman trace but some titular bishoprics. Narky Blert (talk) 13:16, 30 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
Classical scholars often refer to "Roman Africa" as a cultural entity, so I like the idea of making this a proper overview article. It's fine to have the more specific articles on provinces as defined by proconsular assignments, but if your RS doesn't specify that way and speaks simply of "mosaics from Roman Africa," then linking to something other than a BCA is potentially misleading or an inaccurate to the intention of the source. Should definitely not be just a dab. Cynwolfe (talk) 14:18, 24 June 2024 (UTC)Reply