| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Reference to Intelligent Inspection Corporation? edit
I can't find any web references to Intelligent Inspection Corporation, and http://www.iictech.com/ is not operational today. Is it defunct? Matt Stan 13:51, 3 May 2004 (UTC)
It is probably inappropriate to associate Alan Turing exclusively with old-fashioned AI. His work on morphogenesis clearly indicates a sophistication that is missing from this article, especially in his later work.
- Your comments are puzzling. First, this is an article about Brooks, not Turing. Second, Turing invented much of "old-fashioned" AI; associating him with its modern beginnings is quite reasonable. Third, Turing's work on morphogenesis is not relevant to an article about AI, let alone an article about Brooks. Finally, Turing is mentioned in the article to provide historic context, which I believe is both accurate and relevant. The reference in no way impugns him. Non-Riemann Hypercube 19:40, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
Added cleanup tag edit
I added a 'prose' tag because most of this important article is in bullet form. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 154.5.108.184 (talk) 01:58, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
Link Dead edit
The .pdf file in the introductory paragraph is dead. Should be fixed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Glench (talk • contribs) 22:07, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Roomba? edit
No mention of the Roomba? That was his big commercial success. --John Nagle (talk) 20:37, 25 January 2020 (UTC)