Talk:Roccamonfina

Latest comment: 14 years ago by GTBacchus in topic Requested move

Requested move

edit
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved GTBacchus(talk) 00:54, 4 June 2010 (UTC)Reply



Roccamonfina (CE)Roccamonfina — Prominent meaning of the town, the article about the former volcano (located in the municipality) is still a red link, the disambiguation page has only 2 titles. It is necessary a simple dablink from the municipal page to the volcano --Dэя-Бøяg 13:56, 27 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

See Wikipedia:Naming conventions (geographic names)#Italy. The use of the abbreviations in new articles is discouraged, but there doesn't seem to be any consensus for moving existing articles to eliminate them. They certainly seem to be present in a number of article titles currently. With regard to Roccamonfina, I support the move over the dab-page content. Deor (talk) 15:01, 28 May 2010 (UTC)Reply
I don't like this disambiguator either, frankly!
But which guideline(s) in particlular? There are an enormous number of guidelines out there, and these are always evolving and not always consistent or even consistently applied. So without knowing which guidelines in particular you mean, it's hard to go much further. On the other hand, if you can be specific there may be scope for improving either the guidelines themselves or their application or both. Andrewa (talk) 22:55, 28 May 2010 (UTC)Reply
See Talk:Alife (CE)#Requested move for continuation of this thread. The claim that CE here is not an acceptable disambiguator under English Wikipedia guidelines is not pursued there so far, but perhaps Wikipedia:Naming conventions (geographic names)#Italy might support it. Not that it's relevant to this particular move, which still appears uncontroversial! Andrewa (talk) 16:02, 29 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

(So far we have a strong consensus to move but a very messy discussion. Wikipedia as I most enjoy it! Andrewa (talk) 23:04, 28 May 2010 (UTC))Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.