Talk:Robert Sitkoff
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Sj in topic The "Controversy" section of this article
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
The "Controversy" section of this article
editThe second paragraph of the "controversy" section of this article has been added by a former Harvard law student, who is angry about the judgment of the administrative board in a discipline matter involving him. I can assert this because I am a colleague of Rob Sitkoff and that former student has emailed every faculty member with a link to the article, bragging about the post.
Is such an edit, citing a single Substack article as a source, appropriate? (tbc: I have not discussed this entry with Sitkoff, nor has he asked me to add this entry.)