The "Controversy" section of this article

edit

The second paragraph of the "controversy" section of this article has been added by a former Harvard law student, who is angry about the judgment of the administrative board in a discipline matter involving him. I can assert this because I am a colleague of Rob Sitkoff and that former student has emailed every faculty member with a link to the article, bragging about the post.

Is such an edit, citing a single Substack article as a source, appropriate? (tbc: I have not discussed this entry with Sitkoff, nor has he asked me to add this entry.)

lessig (talk) 11:03, 18 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello lessig ~ Bios should not be coatracks for random controversies, even with better sources than that. Thank you for flagging it. – SJ + 06:07, 19 February 2022 (UTC)Reply